Whiteshoes67

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 351 through 375 (of 647 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Elite 8 Weekend Open Thread #83643
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Great game.

    in reply to: Elite 8 Weekend Open Thread #83636
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Somebody please pull webber’s mike.

    in reply to: State’s Season Ends in Sweet 16 #83487
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    I think next year will say a lot about gott and co. Should be very little player turnover. Barring injuries, the pieces will be in place.

    in reply to: State’s Season Ends in Sweet 16 #83481
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    I had krugers sooners coming out of this bracket anyway. He was my #2 behind Marshall last coaching search.

    in reply to: State’s Season Ends in Sweet 16 #83479
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    I didn’t look at the line but Cat not 100% made us a dog in this one. Needed him with his A game.

    in reply to: Sweet 16 – Pack vs. Louisville! #83468
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Cat not being 100% hurt on both ends. That explains the weird lineup I had questions about. It was clear his legs weren’t there. It threw off matchups defensively also. I think we beat then 7 out 10, which is why this stings

    in reply to: Sweet 16 – Pack vs. Louisville! #83460
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Nice stretch run for this team. Still room for optimism if these pieces are still in place next year. Just feels like a golden opportunity lost.

    in reply to: Sweet 16 – Pack vs. Louisville! #83443
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Hate cat wasn’t at his best. Still feels like we left that one on the table

    in reply to: Sweet 16 – Pack vs. Louisville! #83437
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Shot selection and defense not where they need to be. Ball movement against the matchup zone was bad most of night. Give gott some credit for getting kW in the middle in the first half, but the second half lineups for stretches were beyond bad. Zone on d seemed out of place. Outplayed, out coached. I hate to agree with Kenny smith, but he said it best at the half. With our guards, there’s no excuse for not attacking the matchup zone better and having better shot selection. Frustrating to watch.

    in reply to: (8) State vs. (4) Louisville TV: Friday 7:37pm, TBS #82426
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Pitino will attack Cat when they have the ball early and often, and they’ll definitely look to trap him some, get the ball out of his hands when we have it. I do think Pitino was left scratching his head during the first matchup, perplexed and caught off guard more than just a little, so it will be interesting to see what he comes up with. Louisville doesn’t have near the firepower on offense that Duke has, so I don’t expect to get run over in any scenario. Their quality depth is also down. They can’t exactly come at you in waves as in years past.

    in reply to: (8) State vs. (4) Louisville TV: Friday 7:37pm, TBS #82423
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    ^100% agree with tjfoose. If this team and staff think we can simply show up and do what we did in Game 1 versus Pitino and Co, I think we’re in trouble. See Duke.

    Louisville hasn’t been a good offensive team, with or without Jones, but they’re solid defensively. Two keys for us are the same. Good shot selection and solid defensive effort. Been fairly good limiting turnovers, but anything that lets them get out into transition, where they can score easier, helps their offense. Blackshear and Harrell don’t scare me. Key matchups are Cat vs. Rozier and Pitino vs. Gottfried. Better be prepared for some more matchup zone boys.

    in reply to: Round of 32 – Pack vs. Villanova! #81923
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    My 4 month old wore his lucky pack outfit. Wife had him ready to go.

    Major props to team and coaches. Gott gets a big high five for not pulling cat after the quick third. Have always loved what des brings to the table. Jaime Dixon gave him a nice nod in the postgame.

    in reply to: Round of 32 – Pack vs. Villanova! #81846
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Channel the magic lo and v

    in reply to: Round of 32 – Pack vs. Villanova! #81763
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    When the numbers are there, still gotta attack the pressure. And no open 3s

    in reply to: Round of 32 – Pack vs. Villanova! #81652
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Thank you gott for not yanking da daddy cat after the quick third. All in, all night. Send their asses packin

    in reply to: Round of 32 – Pack vs. Villanova! #81577
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Major props to team effort. Dez lee, aod, and twin 1 big

    in reply to: Round of 32 – Pack vs. Villanova! #81571
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Great half on d. Lost a few shooters but reminiscent of unc. I hate sitting players in first half with 2 fouls, especially in a win-or-go-home scenario. Our o stagnates when cat not in. If he picks up a quick third, or early fourth, I pray we go all in

    in reply to: BeeJay Anya to the rescue!!! #CardiacPack #81102
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    I agree with the sentiment. The biggest frustration for me is it’s very clear that this bunch would lay down for one another and gott. But you’ve got to take that love and special bunch of parts, push them, and refine it into a well oiled machine. I don’t see that, win or lose most nights. I want cats toughness and fearlessness in everybody, a recognition of roles by everyone not named Lenard, and a little discipline. Gimme that and you gott something that can really dance

    in reply to: Round of 64 – Pack vs. LSU! #81098
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    You’re on the 8-9 line for a reason. 2 very similar teams. Both capable od laying turds or looking like a top 10 club. They shat themselves worse in the second than we did in the first. Maybe we get rolling next round. Not sure we turned it over 10 times in a half all season, so maybe we got the yips out

    in reply to: Round of 64 – Pack vs. LSU! #81090
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    My criticism of lacy doesn’t take away how pivotal he is. The point is that shot selection and defense still remain the biggest challenges for this team

    in reply to: Round of 64 – Pack vs. LSU! #81089
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    As I said all year, cat didn’t shoot enough from 3 last season or early this year. He was never a sub 30% shooter from 3. Defenses sagged on him. Learning you can’t blow by everyone is far different than settling for early step back threes and long jumpers. He’s learned. Which is my point. The comparison is apt. Lacy doesn’t have the accelerator but he uses his body to get into the lane well. His decision making gas zilch to do with how he’s defended or shot selection. Zip

    in reply to: Round of 64 – Pack vs. LSU! #81075
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Bill, Lacy’s shot selection has worsened and willingness to attack the rim diminished. He can get a shot virtually anytime, but knowing when and where to pick his spots isn’t a strength. Cat already shows better judgement in two years

    in reply to: Round of 64 – Pack vs. LSU! #80971
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Oh my. V and lo, channel. Lsu wins the dunce award

    in reply to: Round of 64 – Pack vs. LSU! #80962
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Cat isolation. Anything else is dumb

    in reply to: Round of 64 – Pack vs. LSU! #80944
    Whiteshoes67
    Participant

    Who will win the dunce award? It’s a heckuva of contest.

Viewing 25 posts - 351 through 375 (of 647 total)