Trout

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 34 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pack9 Heads to ATL to Face GT #102635
    Trout
    Participant

    If I was trying to start a heavy metal band, Deatherage might not be a bad name.

    Team has been playing really well, but some very good teams coming up. Basically, almost the entire Top 25 is either ACC or SEC teams.

    Trout
    Participant

    Anyone see the end of regulation? I get that the basket didn’t count with shot clock violation, but the foul happened BEFORE the clock expired. Shouldn’t we have gone to line?

    in reply to: State-LSU Thurs approx. 9:20pm, TBS #80193
    Trout
    Participant

    Comparing LSU to NC State:

    Dancecard: 29; 26
    RPI: 54; 40
    BPI: 41; 37
    SOS: 97; 6
    1-25: 2-1; 3-6
    26-50: 1-1; 1-2
    51-100: 9-3; 6-2

    in reply to: NC State #8 in the East — Plays LSU #80116
    Trout
    Participant

    Teams with best chance to make it to Final Four, according to ESPN BPI

    Kentucky 81%, Wisconsin 46%, Gonzaga 43%, UVA 38%, Nova 36%, Arizona 36%, Duke 27%

    in reply to: NC State #8 in the East — Plays LSU #80107
    Trout
    Participant

    Kiss of death, Jay Williams just said we would beat Nova

    in reply to: NC State #8 in the East — Plays LSU #80105
    Trout
    Participant

    I hate the NC Central didn’t win the tourney and get a NCAAT invite, but they could do some real damage in the NIT

    in reply to: NC State #8 in the East — Plays LSU #80100
    Trout
    Participant

    I love Iowa State. They are a real Final 4 threat.

    in reply to: NC State #8 in the East — Plays LSU #80093
    Trout
    Participant

    Well, in the NCAAT, good coaches shine. That is what worries me about L-Ville and Nova. (and UVA, although Bennett isn’t as tourney tested). And, to previous points, UVA needs to be worried about Izzo. He is a damn good tourney coach. Krueger, I don’t think so. He did get Florida to a Final 4, but he doesn’t scare me.

    in reply to: NC State #8 in the East — Plays LSU #80092
    Trout
    Participant

    Neither are disciplined enough to beat UVA. But of course, I’m assuming Justin Anderson will be healthy for UVa. If so, I stand by my prediction.

    in reply to: NC State #8 in the East — Plays LSU #80085
    Trout
    Participant

    Our path to the Final 4 would be LSU, Nova, L-Ville and UVA. Tough, very tough. Some damn good coaches after LSU.

    I love NC State, but if I were betting, I’d take UVA out of that region. If I were a UVA fan, I would be very happy tonight.

    in reply to: NC State #8 in the East — Plays LSU #80081
    Trout
    Participant

    Half of all the ACC teams in one region? Has that ever happened before?

    in reply to: Variations in ACC BB Schedules #79472
    Trout
    Participant

    Very well done and an interesting analysis.

    How much of the a factor is the “we had to play you, you had to play us” in this? For example, we got a 16 win factor by playing UVA. They got a 10 win factor by playing us.

    in reply to: State beats Clemson 66-61 #77484
    Trout
    Participant

    Why the huge disparity between DanceCard and the Palm’s and Lunardi’s of the world?

    in reply to: State beats Clemson 66-61 #77477
    Trout
    Participant

    Bubble is very weak this year. We get to 19 wins, we are in, I dont care how it happens. Top 5 SOS, .500 conference record, 3 Top 20 RPI wins.

    in reply to: State beats Clemson 66-61 #77473
    Trout
    Participant

    Lose, Lose = Out, I could see happening. But I don’t think it is 100%. IMO we Lose, Win,Lose = In. One more win and we are IN. For Sure!

    in reply to: State beats Clemson 66-61 #77470
    Trout
    Participant

    Any additional wins, and we are in.

    But let’s play NC State $H*T and say we lose to Syracuse and then lose Wed in ACCT. We would be 18-14. Still in?

    For ACCT: we are either going to be 6th or 7th seed, most likely (not sure how all the tiebreakers work), could possibly be 8 or 9.

    (8) vs. (9) — Noon, ESPN / ACC Network
    (5) vs. (12) Boston College / (13) Georgia Tech winner — 2 p.m., ESPN / ACCN
    (7) vs. (10) Florida State — 7 p.m., ESPN / ACC Network
    (6) vs. (11) Wake Forest / (14) Virginia Tech winner — 9 p.m., ESPN / ACCN

    in reply to: State beats Clemson 66-61 #77465
    Trout
    Participant

    http://www.unf.edu/~jcoleman/dance.htm

    Moved up 3 spots on Dancecard to 26

    BPI 40, RPI 46

    in reply to: State beats Clemson 66-61 #77461
    Trout
    Participant

    Clemson scored 33 points in the first 36:30

    28 in the last 3:30

    in reply to: State beats Clemson 66-61 #77456
    Trout
    Participant

    Huge win for three bubble reasons: 1)Worst we can finish is 18-14, and no team has ever been selected as an at-large with 15 losses. You didnt want to be in the position where someone asks “have we ever selected a team with 15 losses, and the answer come back as “no” 2)According to Palm, not since UGA in 2001 at 16-14 has a team been selected at-large without at least a 4 games over .500 overall record. 3)we are now 9-8 in the ACC, worst we can finish is 9-9. Some of the bubble teams will have losing conference records (Texas), we will not.

    in reply to: One More Week #76798
    Trout
    Participant

    Lunardi now has us as a #10 Seed playing #7 Ohio State with winner getting Arizona in Portland.

    Last Four Byes
    Oregon
    Indiana
    NC State
    Temple

    Last Four In
    Cincinnati
    Colorado State
    Purdue
    BYU

    First Four Out
    Davidson
    UCLA
    Illinois
    Pittsburgh

    in reply to: One More Week #76792
    Trout
    Participant
    in reply to: One More Week #76791
    Trout
    Participant

    ^It happens when a conference is really strong.

    Some 7-9 teams from the ACC of old have made it. V’s comment was always “7-7, go to heaven” (NCAAT), back when we played 14 ACC games.

    in reply to: One More Week #76789
    Trout
    Participant

    Interesting that Clemson’s Senior Day was Saturday against GT, not our game tomorrow night.

    The ONLY saving grace for the BC loss is that it put us at a 10 right now. It could end up costing us a NCAA bid, which would obviously be bad, but IMO, a 10 is much better than a 9 or 8. With Gonzaga no longer a #1 seed option, and with Duke and UVA most likely being #1 seeds, with us at a 9 or 8 we would either get Kentucky or Villanova/Kansas in a possible 2nd round game. I’d take my chances with Nova, but I’d rather be a 10 seed and stay away from that.

    The other side is that BC loss prevented us from getting a 7 (unless we make the ACCT finals). But honestly, 7/10, not much difference.

    Indiana (7) vs NC State (10) seems a popular matchup right now.

    I agree with SFN, go 1-1 and I think we are probably in. A L @Clemson isn’t a bad loss (like BC), but would mean it all comes down to the Syracuse game. A W at Clemson is a road win against a Top 100 RPI team.

    in reply to: ACC Mid-Season Review #72913
    Trout
    Participant

    Well done. You wont find a better mid season review than this, ANYWHERE.

    Hindsight being 20/20, 2 games from the first half of the ACC still bother me: Clemson, because of the way we played, and ND because let a chance for a 2nd signature win get away. Win both of those, and we are in the discussion for a Thursday night ACCT start and right there to grab a Top 4 seed in the NCAAT.

    in reply to: NC State vs. Florida State – The Last 10 Years #56984
    Trout
    Participant

    Since that B1G team was mentioned:

    http://maryland.247sports.com/Bolt/Ohio-State-Returns-Tickets-for-Maryland-Game-31486575

    (Ohio State is returning part of their allotment for the game next week at MD)

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 34 total)