Game Thread – Wolfpack Football in Blacksburg

Home Forums All StateFansNation Game Thread – Wolfpack Football in Blacksburg

Viewing 25 posts - 151 through 175 (of 337 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #90161
    Classof89
    Participant

    We just knocked Motley out of the game. AFter that awful UNC game in Charlotte, we know 3rd string QBs are the kiss of death for us…

    #90162
    Rick
    Keymaster

    Maybe we can beat the third string qb

    #90163
    Texpack
    Participant

    THe playcalling continues to boggle my mind…Seven straight runs, and then a rollout pass on 3rd and 2? WTF?? And what good does a field goal do when you are downn 11?

    It’s called the element of surprise. Like the blind man at the drive through. Never ends well but it’s a surprise.

    #90164
    golf76
    Participant

    Yes, I am going to do this. Not sure all the facts were considered. Personally I love that we don’t have two strong running backs now and that we have to take field goals instead of TD’s. Don’t you? Go ahead and cut this post but if we had Shad we would likely be undefeated now and ahead in this game.

    #90165
    Classof89
    Participant

    THough I hate to agree with Mack Brown, I thought for sure they were setting up something else (play action, some kind of misdirection)….but evidently they were not. I’ve never met Canada or seen him speak. Is he not the sharpest knife in the drawer?

    #90166
    BJD95
    Keymaster

    I don;t mind the 3rd and 2 pass…assuming you are willing to fucking go for it on 4th.

    #90167
    TheAliasTroll
    Participant

    I think perhaps this team just needs more STAAAAHHHSS

    #90168
    SaccoV
    Participant

    Good to hear from you Rick! Maybe we’ll bring Shad back to kick for us!!

    #90169
    Classof89
    Participant

    Right–you run the low percentage roll-out because you have something special for 4th an 2…Fake FG maybe? And then #$%^ Bambard gets another delay. I thought the Heisman pose was cute at first…now it just irritates me.

    #90170
    TheAliasTroll
    Participant

    Think good ole Dave will call out the fans for not showing up tonight?

    #90171
    Classof89
    Participant

    Clearly, they’ve figured out something about VT’s d-line..

    #90172
    Classof89
    Participant

    does look like we are wearing down their D a little…but we have to finish…

    #90173
    BJD95
    Keymaster

    No, you throw a pass because you think they won’t be expecting it and can get a TD instead of just a 1st down.

    #90174
    Classof89
    Participant

    lame blocking by #48

    #90175
    TheAliasTroll
    Participant

    something therapeutic about venting during the bitch phase of the games.. and Lord knows we have those each game… each “real” game I should say

    #90176
    Classof89
    Participant

    I understand…but why call the slow-developing rollout?

    #90177
    BJD95
    Keymaster

    Wide open, and a shit pass. UGH

    #90178
    BJD95
    Keymaster

    I understand…but why call the slow-developing rollout?

    Yeah, not defending that particular call, just the idea of throwing in general. Slow-developing just allows them to react.

    #90179
    TheAliasTroll
    Participant

    Brisset moving nicely in the pocket, but his arm been asleep for the last two games. At least he’s not put it on the ground like he’s wont to do.

    #90180
    Classof89
    Participant

    We just can’t seem to consistently execute against a P-5 defense…there are flashes of brilliance, which makes it all the more frustrating. I tell you what, Doeren goes 2-6 or 3-5 in the ACC, there will be lots of grumbling in this offseason. He’s in Tom Reed territory in terms of ACC winning percentage if he loses tonight…

    #90181
    Texpack
    Participant

    This makes me appreciate watching the Coogs play. Ward is the real deal as a QB. I wish Brisett was better on the deep throws. It’s his one glaring weakness.

    #90182
    Khan
    Participant

    Our air assault is lethal….

    #90183
    Wufpacker
    Participant

    Yes, I am going to do this. Not sure all the facts were considered. Personally I love that we don’t have two strong running backs now and that we have to take field goals instead of TD’s. Don’t you? Go ahead and cut this post but if we had Shad we would likely be undefeated now and ahead in this game.

    Cut this post? Why on Earth would I do that? Aaaannnnddd…is that gangsta speak fo’ “delete”???

    I’d love to have Shad in the backfield.

    Sadly, I’m able to actually view real world events real-ly. ie….Shad fucked up…as I previously mentioned.

    In a perfect world, Shad could smoke weed, beat women and run over innocent civilians during the week while running for TD’s and rescuing otherwise losing fball teams from the dregs of loserdom on Saturday (or Friday in this case).

    In closing…yeah, I’d LOVE to have Shad. Who made that not possible??? Yeah, Shad.

    #90184
    Classof89
    Participant

    And the inability to competently down a punt inside the 10 the last two games also irritates the heck out of me…

    #90185
    Classof89
    Participant

    we HAVE to take advantage of Motley’s limited mobility…and it does no good to let them pick up a 1st down or two and change field position….

Viewing 25 posts - 151 through 175 (of 337 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.