Home › Forums › All StateFansNation › CBS Sports Top 101 baskteball players
- This topic has 33 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 1 month ago by StateFans.
-
AuthorPosts
-
10/13/2015 at 11:10 AM #90448RickKeymaster
I am not sure what to make of this list. It has freshmen (ones that have never played) ranked high but has Cat way down at 67. Both PAige and Meeks are ranked ahead of him. I have not heard of some of these players. It is just a weird list.
10/13/2015 at 11:43 AM #90449tjfoose1ParticipantNot weird at all. It’s troll piece in search of clicks.
It has Duke’s Grayson Allen at 41.
10/15/2015 at 6:41 AM #90500tractor57ParticipantIn the end who gives a crap. Troll piece as ‘foose says.
10/15/2015 at 7:35 AM #90501RickKeymasterMy bad. I tought it would be interesting to stop arguing about football. I will not make that mistake again.
10/15/2015 at 8:04 AM #90503WulfpackParticipantI really don’t care right now either. It’s early. But Allen will be playing in the NBA so that doesn’t seem off to me. Heck of a young talent.
10/15/2015 at 11:17 AM #90511tjfoose1ParticipantMy comment was not meant as a criticism of the share.
10/15/2015 at 1:19 PM #90520VaWolf82KeymasterNot weird at all. It’s troll piece in search of clicks.
Surely no one can be surprised whenever cbs puts up another troll piece. I’m sure that Doyel has taught them well.
PS – according to wikipedia, doyel left cbs for the indy star. With Doyel and Goodman gone, if they got rid of Parrish, cbs might be close to troll free.
10/15/2015 at 1:27 PM #90521VaWolf82KeymasterSpeaking of click-bait, CBS ranks all of college basketball
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/eye-on-college-basketball/25331040/cbs-sports-2015-16-ranking-of-every-college-basketball-team-from-1-3511 – UNC
5 – UVA
7 – Duke
20 – ND
21 – UM
32 – NCSU
43 – Syr
48 – FSU
50 – L’ville
60 – Pitt
77 – WF
90 – GT
98 – Clemson
109 – VT
212 – BC10/15/2015 at 2:17 PM #905231.21 JigawattsKeymasterVa,
At first I thought you were listing all of the teams in a Fibonacci sequence but then realized that it was just the ACC and all 206 teams in the conference.
10/15/2015 at 3:37 PM #90530VaWolf82KeymasterThe Fibonacci Sequence is the series of numbers: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, … The next number is found by adding up the two numbers before it. The 2 is found by adding the two numbers before it (1+1)
Yes I had to google it.
Just for kicks, I copied this ranking down for review on the Jan 1 entry where I look at RPI at the end of the pre-season.
10/15/2015 at 6:19 PM #90533tractor57ParticipantNo comment on the share – comment on the quality of the data (so called) in the link.
10/15/2015 at 9:55 PM #905471.21 JigawattsKeymasterJust for kicks, I copied this ranking down for review on the Jan 1 entry where I look at RPI at the end of the pre-season.
Oh I can’t wait to see the unrealistic expectations meet reality. The denials and excuses will be flying around here.
10/15/2015 at 10:21 PM #90548pakfanistanParticipantOh I can’t wait to see the unrealistic expectations meet reality. The denials and excuses will be flying around here.
I’m struggling to figure out what this means.
10/15/2015 at 10:23 PM #90549pakfanistanParticipantThis is pretty cool.
http://gopack.com/news/2015/10/14/BAM-Testing.aspx
The improvement in player athleticism from 2012 to now is phenomenal.
10/16/2015 at 7:39 AM #90552RickKeymasterOh I can’t wait to see the unrealistic expectations meet reality. The denials and excuses will be flying around here.
I’m struggling to figure out what this means.
I cannot speak for Jig but my guess is similar to the football predictions, people are going to expect too much from this team. This team has some potential but the loss of Lacey really hurts. IMO there are some flaws that will keep us from being an “upper tier” team. I think we will make the tournament but with Lacey we could have been a real threat.
As to the denials and excuses, again you can look at football as an example. Read the preseason thread and the most recent game thread.Just to be clear this is in no way a ciriticism of Gott just my initial evaluation of the team.
10/16/2015 at 8:11 AM #90554Since74Participant^
“IMO there are some flaws that will keep us from being an “upper tier” team.”Just out of curiosity, what “flaws” are you concerned about?
I’m a bit worried about point when Cat is out and I think we may miss Kyle more than anyone has mentioned. If for no other reason than the chip that he always played with. (Rewatch the Duke game to see his best.)Overall I’m optimistic and have high hopes for this group though.
10/16/2015 at 8:27 AM #90555redisgoodParticipantOh I can’t wait to see the unrealistic expectations meet reality. The denials and excuses will be flying around here.
I’m struggling to figure out what this means.
I cannot speak for Jig but my guess is similar to the football predictions, people are going to expect too much from this team. This team has some potential but the loss of Lacey really hurts. IMO there are some flaws that will keep us from being an “upper tier” team. I think we will make the tournament but with Lacey we could have been a real threat.
As to the denials and excuses, again you can look at football as an example. Read the preseason thread and the most recent game thread.Just to be clear this is in no way a ciriticism of Gott just my initial evaluation of the team.
Yeah, I tend to agree with this assessment. The loss of Lacy is huge, and Kyle brought some strong intangibles to the table. A lot has to happen for this team to be really good. Injury free Cat, Henderson filling the Turner role, improvements from the Martins and Abu, emergence of another ball handler, a solid contribution from Rowan, and Beejay adding some scoring and rebounding to his shot blocking skills. I see no problem making the tourney, but a few things have to break the right way to go beyond that.
10/16/2015 at 8:29 AM #90556RickKeymasterHere are the flaws as I see them. Some may be fixed some I don’t think can be.
1) PG – Any injury, bad play, fatigue, or foul trouble with Cat and we are in big trouble.
2) Big men- we only have three one of which is coming off of a stress fracture and another is not known for his endurance. They also did not score a lot last year. We are going to need more scoring and less fouling from them.
3) Go to player – Last year when we needed a big shot Lacey or Turner took it. Who is that going to be this year and are they ready for it?
4) Press – we did not handle this well at times and only seemed to get better when Lacey handled it. Can Cat handle it?
5) Shooting – Turner and Lacey are gone. None of the returning players have proven they are great shooters. There are a lot of potentials but will any of them prove they can do it?I don’t think this will be a bad year just not a great one.
10/16/2015 at 10:24 AM #90560TexpackParticipantI can’t imagine people having really high expectations for this team. There are too many question marks to have high EXPECTATIONS. I do think this team has a high CEILING if all of the questions are answered in our favor.
Gott has shown an ability to maximize the results from flawed teams. We will just have to see how long it takes to identify our major flaws and how we can mask them. I’m mostly curious to see who will be the guy who can create and take the big shots. I will peg us in the 6-8 range in terms of conference finish. If everything clicks that moves up to 2-3.
It is never too early to discuss basketball, period.
10/16/2015 at 12:12 PM #90561Tau837ParticipantI have high expectations. If they aren’t met, I won’t be back in here with “denials and excuses.”
10/16/2015 at 12:32 PM #90562MPParticipant^^ Amen; and ^ Amen.
We have a good coaching staff, good veteran players, and good incoming players. I am excited for this season and have high hopes. And I certainly don’t give a sh!t if anyone criticizes me for that!
10/16/2015 at 1:03 PM #90563Since74ParticipantAll good observations Rick.
I thought Cat was pretty good against the press towards the end of the season last year though. As far as shooting goes you’re right that no one is proven but it seems like we have too many options for someone not to step up.
The backup PG and bigs rotation will probably show problematic at times. Hoping for low frequencies and short durations on those fronts.Tex I’m thinkin’ 6 to 8 is a bit low. I’ll go 3 to 6.
10/16/2015 at 2:17 PM #90564WulfpackParticipantWe can have a very good, even great, year. But there are uncertainties that have been very well stated as it stands today. Not unlike many teams. I definitely like what we have coming back.
10/16/2015 at 2:48 PM #90565Since74Participant^
I like that you use the term “uncertainties”. I don’t see us as a flawed team.10/16/2015 at 3:07 PM #90566RickKeymasterAll good observations Rick.
I thought Cat was pretty good against the press towards the end of the season last year though. As far as shooting goes you’re right that no one is proven but it seems like we have too many options for someone not to step up.
The backup PG and bigs rotation will probably show problematic at times. Hoping for low frequencies and short durations on those fronts.Tex I’m thinkin’ 6 to 8 is a bit low. I’ll go 3 to 6.
Agreed, Cat was bette at the end of the year. My concern is how he will perform beign the only real ball handler. No relief.
We could be anywhere from 3-9.
Gott has proven to be good at finding and fixing flaws by the end of the year. But that is why our regular season is not great. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.