ACC presidents approve Grant of Rights

ACC.com:

The Atlantic Coast Conference Council of Presidents announced today that each of the current and future 15-member institutions has signed a grant of media rights, effective immediately.

“This announcement further highlights the continued solidarity and commitment by our member institutions,” said ACC Commissioner John Swofford. “The Council of Presidents has shown tremendous leadership in insuring the ACC is extremely well positioned with unlimited potential.”

“The ACC has long been a leader in intercollegiate athletics, both academically and athletically,” said the collective ACC Council of Presidents. “Collectively, we all agree the grant of rights further positions the ACC and its current and future member schools as one of the nation’s premier conferences.”

Stewart Mandel simplifies what this means; essentially, the ACC ended any speculation of further attrition (SI.com):

The ACC announced Monday that its presidents have signed a Grant of Rights agreement through 2026-27. That means the conference now owns its 15 current and future members’ television rights for the duration of that period, effectively blocking those schools from joining another conference (because what conference would add a school if it can’t cash in on its television revenue)? The Big 12’s own six-year Grant of Rights agreement reached in October 2011 (and since extended through 2025) greatly stabilized that then-tenuous conference, allowing it to add TCU and West Virginia and ink an eventual long-term deal with ESPN and FOX.

While there had been little talk recently of any further realignment among the power conferences, both fans and industry insiders felt another move would come soon enough — and nearly all speculation centered around ACC schools.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

ACC ACC Teams

21 Responses to ACC presidents approve Grant of Rights

  1. wolfbuff 04/22/2013 at 4:50 PM #

    Has a G of R ever been tested in court? Assuming it would hold up, this pretty much shuts the door on any more poaching the ACC. I imagine other major conferences will follow suit, thus providing a little stability on the conference carousel.

  2. LRM 04/22/2013 at 5:53 PM #

    This is an important move; it’s what kept the Big XII two years ago. You’re worthless without a TV market.

  3. 13OT 04/22/2013 at 6:21 PM #

    I don’t think realignment is anywhere near finished.

  4. Pack78 04/22/2013 at 6:41 PM #

    Looks like Swoffy (and his kid) will have a job for a while longer. I would imagine that any future ND full ACC membership discussion would include a condition of GoR-don’t think that they would ever go for it…thoughts?

  5. SaccoV 04/22/2013 at 6:45 PM #

    Swofford & Co. have yet to convince me of their ability to show strength. The suit with Maryland will be settled out of court for the exit fee will be the real determiner of whether or not the GoR has teeth. Again, no one has stated anything about dissolution. Does anyone have the full text of the GoR?

  6. Master 04/22/2013 at 8:37 PM #

    SaccoV -this does not apply to Maryland. Maryland’s ultimate exit fee is not a show of Swofford’s strength – it will be proof that the exit fee law is weak which is why we now have a Grant of Rights.

  7. Pack1998 04/22/2013 at 10:14 PM #

    Would love think Yow had the nuts to take State to the SEC – reality is she is a tuff lady, but never had that vision.

    ACC in tact – Norte Dame never comes in football. Becomes the beat basketball conf.

    And SEC still the gold standard for overall dollars.

    I needed to see the cards before I can say what I would have done.

  8. Pack1998 04/22/2013 at 10:15 PM #

    Typos everywhere

  9. theghost 04/22/2013 at 11:48 PM #

    unfortunate. if this is solid, it throws away what’s left of any hope for accountability for swofford. expect the blues’ abuses of power to get even worse. What do you possibly gain from signing this that’s more valuable than what you lose?

  10. VaWolf82 04/23/2013 at 9:52 AM #

    One tidbit in Mandel’s column should solve an issue that has been debated around here before…..The ACC’s TV deal ranks 5th among the conferences and that difference left the ACC vulnerable for further poaching.

  11. BJD95 04/23/2013 at 10:57 AM #

    Great, we’ve anchored ourselves firmly to the last place major conference. LMFAO

  12. packalum44 04/23/2013 at 11:09 AM #

    I think the following schools: Miami/Duke/Wake/BC/Syracuse are doing back flips of joy. I think the rest have mixed emotion.

    There are 4 good spots open in SEC/Big X. There are 9 legitimate candidates.

    1- UVA
    2- VATech
    3- GA Tech
    4- UNC
    5- NCState
    6- Clemson
    7- FL State
    8- Pittsburgh
    9- Louisville

    Leftovers go to Big XII.

    Expanding TV markets being key, I really like our shot to the SEC. It is still a gamble, but one worth taking. High risk high reward. Even the worst case to Big XII is more money.

    I don’t see how those 9 schools are not better off with an ACC implosion. I also don’t see how the benefits (extra millions) outweigh the costs (political and legal battles waged) for the schools administrators (AD/Chancellor).

    Anyone notice that Texas A&M’s football recruiting has leapfrogged Texas after their move to the SEC????

  13. vtpackfan 04/23/2013 at 11:31 AM #

    This shows the weakness of not only the ACC office, but also the leadership of each institution. When it took time for action they all got together and copied the Big 12 model as the best solution. The Big 12? That conference has always been in turmoil historically going back to the breakup of the SWC. It has also been viewed as being to “Austin”-centric, and not egalitarian enough, driving great football brands like Nebraska, and A & M to march off. This falls in line with the approach that what is best for UNC (similar to Texas) is best for everyone. Dissapointed but not in the least surprised. No matter who is in charge at NCSU, the line in the sand is always made by the UNC BoG, and we have way too much evidence to support the idea that there is one, and only one, institution that matters to them.

  14. SaccoV 04/23/2013 at 12:06 PM #

    Agreed with VTPackfan in this as a demonstration of the weakness of the office and the school Presidents. Do you think Swoff had some dirt on some of the them to force their hand? It seems that FSU can still dictate its own terms with another conference. I’m wondering what loophole is left when the ink dries on this one. I can’t imagine that FSU and Clemson would sign something so seemingly contrary to their possible financial gains as this without some possible out scenario.

  15. rtpack24 04/23/2013 at 12:28 PM #

    How does this apply to Notre Dame football?

  16. gumby 04/23/2013 at 2:54 PM #

    When asked for comment, various UNx Board of Governors members asked “how will this affect u*nx recruiting?”

  17. BJD95 04/23/2013 at 3:48 PM #

    Holes, Pitt and Ville added to the backflippers. Holes because they get to not only keep their personal cabal in place, but added cement to the crooked, filthy foundation. Absolutely no ramifications for their shitty and incompetent behavior, as usual. Pitt and Ville because obviously if they had prospects for any of the better conferences (that is, all four of them) they wouldn’t have jumped aboard our leaky lifeboat.

    ND only jumped because we were stupid enough to give them the deal that essentially killed the Big East previously. And you can bet your sweet ass they gave up NOTHING in terms of their football rights (ie, the only ones worth anything).

    NC State should feel the most ashamed of any of the non-backflipper stooges. We accepted a significantly worse deal than TAMU walked away from because they were tired of all the Longhorn fluffing. And we never even TRIED to explore our options. We just took whatever our “betters” gave us.

    F-ck, I am angry. I had been reconsidering the Wolfpack Club’s entreaties to talk at least (like four freaking years late), but this just cements my prior decision.

  18. mak4dpak 04/23/2013 at 9:22 PM #

    Whether or not you like the ACC, I think this reaffirms what I always felt about the remaining teams. Ain’t Nobody Going Nowhere. Go ACC!

  19. highstick 04/24/2013 at 7:57 PM #

    We fired Lee Fowler for this? Crap, he could have pulled this BS off all by himself!

    I’m freakin’ disgusted with what’s going on again!

  20. theghost 04/25/2013 at 6:53 PM #

    I’m thinking there’s got to be a loophole. You lawyers out there – does the fact that it is a “grant” imply that it has no consideration, and is therefore not a binding contract? Or are there some gaping loopholes that allow backing out for any number of reasons?

    The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is drummed up as window dressing and has no real legal teeth. Otherwise I’m baffled at the motivation to sign this for anybody but Wake Forest.

  21. BloggerEsquire 04/26/2013 at 11:24 AM #

    @BJD95, when you say ” And we never even TRIED to explore our options” is that actually true?

    Is there any chance that some folks did try to explore their options and (unfortunately) this was the best option? I.e. the doors to the other conferences were closed for whatever reason?

    That seems equally plausible to me.

Leave a Reply