Plagiarism prong has arrove (McAdoo plagiarism uncovered by Pack Pride hooligans)

The recent news that former UNC-CH football player Michael McAdoo was suing the NCAA and UNC-CH (covered here by WRAL) led to one of McAdoo’s papers becoming public.  It took less than one afternoon for McAdoo’s apparent plagiarism in this paper to be discovered by UNC-CH’s least favorite group of message board yahoos.  The plagiarism story has now been picked up by several outlets, first by Sports by Brooks, and later by Sports Illustrated and the DTH.  The Sports by Brooks piece is especially good in that it goes through the material in detail, proving that much of the material in the paper was cut and pasted.

Also, I am not sure who put together this pdf, but it goes through the first few pages of the McAdoo Frankenpaper and shows,using a clear format and in detail, how much material was lifted and exactly from where it was lifted.  For example, it explains the actual source behind such dubious sentences as:

These winds have been blowing with metronome regularity for eons, carrying dhows laden with cargo.

McAdoo (in glasses) pictured above at a Washington, D.C. 2011 post-draft party with Quinn and Coples.

Alert readers will remember that McAdoo was ruled permanently ineligible by the NCAA for his involvment with both the tutor and agent prongs.  You can read this past SFN entry for a recap.  Readers who want a full understanding of the McAdoo saga should explore this pdf document.  It contains transcripts, exhibits, and other items connected with McAdoo’s eligibility appeal.  For example, on page 73 of that document, you can read a transcript of the NCAA appeal hearing, in which McAdoo says:

Since I arrove at the University of North Carolina, I have had a lot of support as a student athlete and have trusted a lot of people to help me be successful.

Yes, that’s right, he said “arrove.”  All SFN readers are hereby officially ordered to work the word “arrove” into the next conversation you have with any UNC fan who has ever taunted you with the word “amphibious.”

Regarding the paper itself, if you want to, you can read it beginning on page 127 of that same pdf.  This quote from the DTH article does a good job of explaining the nature of the Frankenpaper if you don’t care and/or don’t have time to read through it and its sources in detail (emphasis mine):

McAdoo’s paper uses three consecutive paragraphs from a Tanzanian journalist’s blog post “Know the history of Swahili language and its original culture.” The paragraphs are nearly word for word from the blog post, which was written less than two months before McAdoo’s paper was turned in on July 13, 2009.

The paper also takes two paragraphs from an article entitled “The Brief History of the Swahili Language,” which was found on the Zanzinet Forum.

There is no mention of the blog post anywhere in the paper, including the works cited page that Wiley was found to have done for him.

McAdoo’s paper takes a substantial amount of work from Charles Cornelius’ “The History of the East African Coast.” McAdoo cites some usage of the book but claims several paragraphs as his own throughout his paper. On page four of his paper, McAdoo uses an entire paragraph that is nearly verbatim from the second page of the book’s introduction.

According to the Instrument of Student Judicial Governance, Section II.B.1, plagiarism is defined as “the deliberate or reckless representation of another’s words,thoughts, or ideas as one’s own without attribution in connection with submission of academic work, whether graded or otherwise.”

McAdoo’s professor Dr. Julius Nyang’oro is out of the country and did not immediately respond to emails.

It will be interesting to see how McAdoo’s lawyers spin the previous claim that the Frankenpaper was McAdoo’s original work and that he only cheated by getting help with cite forms.  Also from the DTH:

“This work reflects his ideas exclusively,” said Steve Keady from UNC’s legal counsel during McAdoo’s appeals teleconference with the NCAA. “It is not a rip off. This really is his work.”

and

“We are arguing that this was Michael McAdoo’s work, even the citations were his work. They were not formatted correctly, however,” UNC athletic director Dick Baddour said during the appeals teleconference.

I guess by “his work,” they mean that McAdoo himself hit control-c and control-v repeatedly.   Just for fun, let’s take a roll call of all the adults connected to UNC-CH who had access to this paper.  I am sure I have missed some, but included in the group must be:

UNC Honor Court? Check.
AD? Check
Tutor(s) paid for by the University and/or under the private employ of the Head Coach? Check
McAdoo’s UNC-grad Attorneys? Check
UNC Professor? Check

You are telling me that NONE of those UNC-CH-connected adults recognized McAdoo’s Frankenpaper for what it was?  They really supposedly believed that a person who would use “arrove” in a formal setting could also write things such as “These winds have been blowing with metronome regularity for eons…”???

General UNC Scandal

100 Responses to Plagiarism prong has arrove (McAdoo plagiarism uncovered by Pack Pride hooligans)

  1. blpack 07/09/2011 at 2:37 PM #

    The house of cards is just about to fall. Can’t see any adults over there standing behind Butchie much longer, then again the adults in Chapel Hill have been either muted or preferred to be quiet while the university burns.

  2. MattN 07/09/2011 at 2:44 PM #

    I know you guys give the boys on the monkey board a ton of s#it for their general antics, but they flat out hit a grand-slam here.

    I do not think this is over….

  3. State Fan 07/09/2011 at 2:54 PM #

    It’s a walk-off grand slam, bottom of the 9th, down by 3, on an 0-2 count. It’s the final scene of “The Natural”. It is ABC perfection.

  4. 70wolf 07/09/2011 at 2:55 PM #

    Actually I dont believe this for a minute. Much more plausable is that Wiley lifted all the material, combined it, and turned it over to Do Macadoo fully written. Come on….you know thats what really happened !

  5. State Fan 07/09/2011 at 3:12 PM #

    Coming this fall to Comedy Central: UNC Honor Court – actors posing as “student-athletes” present and defend obviously-plagiarized papers as their own work. Points are awarded as the bogus papers pass muster at each succeeding level of the UNC administration.

  6. TruthBKnown Returns 07/09/2011 at 4:13 PM #

    It seems that lately, the monkey boards have been coming up with some good stuff (namely, this extreme plagiarism, and also the 216 phone issue).

    But the local media is not really running with any of it. Shouldn’t they be pursuing those 216 phone records? Shouldn’t they be officially inquiring about this extreme plagiarism?

    It seems as if they are just leaving us lunatic fringe to our own devices.

    I’m starting to believe maybe they REALLY DO own the media. I’ve long suspected it, but how can they remain so silent on such obvious things that need to be pursued???

  7. IamGumbyDammit 07/09/2011 at 4:27 PM #

    I’m geting confused what “UNC” is an acronym for – is it University or Non-Compliance, Undone by Nannies and Cupcakes, or Unnecessary to Note Citations?

  8. highstick 07/09/2011 at 5:23 PM #

    University of No Credibility!

  9. JeremyH 07/09/2011 at 5:24 PM #

    if this stuff is going on in UNC football, who’s the say this is not going on in UNC basketball? I mean, didn’t they win some championships recently, too? Talk about non-level playing field. Is this why we can’t expect to be as good as UNC in basketball? Because we’re too honest?

  10. TruthBKnown Returns 07/09/2011 at 5:29 PM #

    JeremyH, that is precisely why an INDEPENDENT investigation was and IS needed. They cannot be trusted to perform a competent investigation of their football program. And they have so much more to lose in their basketball program (e.g., vacated national championship(s)…) that they should in no way, shape or form, be trusted to conduct a competent investigation of their basketball program.

  11. golf76 07/09/2011 at 7:52 PM #

    With prose like McAdoo’s, maybe Don Curtis can hire him to work in the news department of one of his radio stations.

  12. gcpack 07/09/2011 at 9:11 PM #

    When I arrove at the SFN website this afternoon I didn’t know it would be this much fun!

  13. wolffpride 07/09/2011 at 9:20 PM #

    TuthBKnown Returns,

    It appears that the N&O is in fact pursuing the personal phone records (216) of Butch Davis. I sent a couple of emails to the N&O a few weeks ago asking if they were seeking the release of these records. I received a response earlier this week from Assistant Sports Editor Lorenzo Perez:

    ” We are indeed pursuing those records. Hopefully, it will not entail going to court again.”

    Take it for what it is worth. But I chalk it up as good news!!!

  14. NOT A FAN OF BLUE 07/09/2011 at 10:04 PM #

    I have arrove at the conclusion that UNC really do be cheat-en. Give me Ivy League football. I’m over it all …

  15. AeroWolf 07/09/2011 at 10:41 PM #

    I arrove at this idea while reading the N&0 article today:

    I want to bring up an aspect I have not seen discussed in this forum. I hate to add to this young man’s troubles, but the plagiarism that seems prevalent in the “paper” appears to add an interesting legal dimension to this lawsuit.

    Mr. McAdoo has become a claimant in a lawsuit against NCAA and UNC, and has submitted the “paper” as evidence of authentic work ( I believe it has been mentioned several time by the lawyers, UNC administration, and other, that the work is original). Does the gathered evidence that the “paper” appears to be extensively plagiarized, represent a case of perjury against the claimant. It can be implied the submission of the “paper” and the statements that were made on its presentation in the lawsuit can be considered under oath. If extensive plagiarism exists in the “paper” which shows that the work is not original, and negates the claim of original work; then this can be interpreted as case where the claimant is committing perjury in his court filing. After looking up NC laws on perjury; it appears that perjury in either a criminal or civil court represents a class F felony.

    Are there any legal minds (lawyers, judges, law students) who can give further information on this issue? Could Mr. McAdoo really of hurt himself even more by filing this lawsuit?

    I originally posted this on the following article:

    Read more: http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/07/09/1331635/mcadoo-paper-made-public.html#ixzz1RfSHJfSQ

  16. MrPlywood 07/10/2011 at 1:42 AM #

    Meanwhile, over at IC, the usual suspects are trying to poke holes in the NCAA and holding tight to the decision of the UNX “Honor Court”. And they’re whining about “unfair treatment” from the N&O – priceless! They’re trying SO hard to “get out of it” that it’s become a farce of legalese… Get your heads out of our collective asses UNXers, it’s over…

    Priceless post of the day:

    “Commentators on Packpride pick out passages that appeared to be plagerized. That is not what the allegations were about though. He received an F for the paper. The allegations were about him getting help from Jennifer Wiley. There certainly are people at rival schools trying to influence the NCAA against these kids at UNC. It is the same case in some of the local media. I would call it a lynch mentality. I think it is part of the reason some of these kids have been treated unfairly because of that mentality from supporters of rival schools. I think a Court of Law will settle it though instead of an organization like the NCAA that can be influenced by rivals.”

  17. JeremyH 07/10/2011 at 6:56 AM #

    “There certainly are handsome and intelligent people at rival schools trying to influence the NCAA against these professional athletes contracted to play at UNC.” /fixed

    hahaha…“lynch mentality”. the truth shall set you free, brutha. don’t blame others, they’re just examining the facts. instead, sir, look to your institution leaders that so elegantly plotted to cheat the system, were caught, and have now permanently soiled the reputation of your school. UNC alums, it’s soul-searching time.

  18. State Fan 07/10/2011 at 8:14 AM #

    http://cgi.ebay.com/UNC-The-Carolina-Way-Reputation-/140573539486?pt=US_NCAA_Fan_Shop&haem20bad5fc9e#ht_500wt_922
    Ebay has removed The Carolina Way from bidding. I guess it concluded UNC already had given it away.

  19. wolfpacker 07/10/2011 at 9:42 AM #

    Can we take a step back and look at the entire process. At MOST universities with any kind of academic integrity this student (without preferential treatment) would have been approached a bit earlier in the process concerning this issue than where we are now. Forget about the NCAA, or the Honor Court (which following in the footsteps of the leadership on the hill, has proven to be a complete JOKE).

    Let’s talk about the people who could have caught the problem first. Was there a blind eye?

    Are you telling me that the professor’s aid nor the professor himself did NOT realize what was happening?
    A professor at unx allows this to happen under his watch?
    Did they care?

    Or was it that they have been ‘told’ to just ‘let it go’.

    Does anyone see a problem here?

    There is such a reckless attitude towards the education of this student, it MUST be embarrassing to the leadership (if that’s what you want to call them). But wait, isn’t this what they wanted?

  20. JeremyH 07/10/2011 at 10:21 AM #

    Yes, that’s what they wanted. The athletes that will later become professional stars are held to a different, lower academic standard because well, their career path does not require them to have a solid academic background..

    But herein lies the problem. Star professional athletes, in our society, serve as role models, and with their millions of dollars are in a position to positively affect our society. If anything, maybe they should be held to an even higher standard. There is so much more to life than status and personal gratifications: collecting tattoos, cars, and women; but I’m sure they even know that.

  21. JeremyH 07/10/2011 at 10:23 AM #

    *not sure

  22. IamGumbyDammit 07/10/2011 at 11:16 AM #

    I was kinda hoping when I logged in today that I would have arroven to more news…

  23. IamGumbyDammit 07/10/2011 at 11:47 AM #

    Cheating in the pre-computer & internet days at UNX was far less rampant, This is primarily because back then, there was far less cutting and pasting – the UNX football payers kept eating all the paste…

  24. tuckerdorm1983 07/10/2011 at 1:56 PM #

    For those sophisticated cheaters out there, you need to pay someone to write your paper and make it believable. That is write a paper that reflects the students abilities. Make sure your paid for paper writer actually writes the paper instead of copying it. Also make sure you read the paper and have a working knowledge of the contents, so that if called in the by teacher you can sound semi-competent. You need to make sure you have a few grammatical errors.
    In the end it is a lot of work to cheat and get away with it. It seems that cheating is a lot of work. I know, instead of spending all that time cheating just go ahead and write the paper. However, cheaters are lazy and that is what gets them caught every time.

  25. TruthBKnown Returns 07/10/2011 at 3:10 PM #

    ” We are indeed pursuing those records. Hopefully, it will not entail going to court again.”

    Take it for what it is worth. But I chalk it up as good news!!!

    That’s indeed great to hear, wolffpride!

Leave a Reply