Update 8:30 pm – Added analysis from UNC blog on today’s Kendrick Burney PR fiasco

11am Update: Durham Herald Sun tweeted the following 11 minutes ago:

#UNC football spokesman Kevin Best said Kendric Burney’s case still hasn’t been resolved

1pm Update: The News & Observer just posted this:

Burney’s case not resolved

North Carolina cornerback Kendric Burney has not been cleared for Saturday’s game at Miami, a team spokesman said this morning.
The NCAA suspended Burney, an All-ACC cornerback, six games for receiving agent-related benefits. He was scheduled to return on Saturday but before UNC’s win at Virginia on Oct. 16, the school announced Burney still had “unresolved issues” related to the ongoing NCAA investigation.

“His case is not resolved,” UNC spokesman Kevin Best said today.

Multiple media outlets have reported that Burney has been cleared by the school’s honor court and will play on Saturday.

4:00 pm update

From the sports editor of the DTH:

jjones9 Jonathan Jones
Kevin Best tells me that Burney will not be adding a class this late in the semester. He wants to end the rumors. Issue is still unresolved

8:30 update

Does anyone wonder what may have led UNC away from allowing Burney to add this class mid-semester? Here is what how a UNC blog broke down today’s events:

So what is happening here? Obviously if Burney needs to add a class it means the honor court gave him a failing grade in a previous one. That means he is short the number of hours he needs to meet certain NCAA academic requirements to be eligible to play football.

At this point in the semester I do not think it is possible to add a class, that is something only UNC can fully answer. One question to ask if why did Burney conclude adding a class was possible if it wasn’t? Is it possible Burney prematurely telling people upset the apple cart and outed what was supposed to be a private process by which UNC and the NCAA work on an agreement to get Burney on the field? If so, Burney’s exuberance might be his undoing. Given the media scrutiny I can see how resolving the issue in such a way that allows Burney to play forces UNC to account for the process. Whereas if Burney goes to the honor court, is found guilty, received an F then UNC discusses it with the NCAA and makes an arrangement with them for Burney to play then all UNC has to do is put out a press release saying Burney is clear while using privacy laws as a means of not talking about how the sausage is made.

If I had to guess, I would say that this has become a bit of a PR issue which might make it difficult for UNC to get Burney on the field.

——————————————————–

Originally posted:

I have said you just can’t make this stuff up in regards to the ongoing scandal in Chapel Hill several times already and the latest news regarding Kendrick Burney continues along that same theme.

Burney went before the Honor Court Monday to hear his case regarding the NCAA investigation into academic fraud. Burney told NewsChannel 12 that if he picks up a class Tuesday morning, he will be allowed to play Saturday at Miami….

….But Burney told us that if he picks up this class, he should be able to play in his first game of the year this weekend.

Updated

-According to the NCAA, a student-athlete only has to enroll in 12 hours to compete except when a student is in his final semester. So let’s speculate on what might be happening with Burney. Let’s say a student-athlete only needs 3 hours to graduate. The NCAA allows that student-athlete to take 3 hours and play football in his final semester. Now let’s say that the same student-athlete all of sudden finds himself in front of the honor court and gets charged with academic fraud causing a failing grade in a previous class. All of a sudden, the player would be ineligible by NCAA rules because they would need to be taking 6 hours.

So what does the university do? They ask a professor on campus to throw academic integrity aside to allow the student-athlete, who committed academic fraud, to enroll in their class 6 weeks after the official deadline of August 30th. If the permission is granted, then the student-athlete would be eligible and can play football this coming weekend. The Carolina Way in a nutshell.

How can a professor grant that permission knowing a kid who was just found guilty of academic fraud, only took the bare minimum needed to graduate at the beginning of the semester(what is the kid doing with the rest of his time in Chapel Hill?), but now is desperate to enroll in your class just so he can play football?

An even better question is how a university that supposedly values integrity and academics first could even put a professor in a position to have to make that decision? Especially when the student-athlete involved has already embarrassed the university by accepting illegal benefits and committing academic fraud?

At some point, one would think somebody in Chapel Hill would stand up and do what is right.

——————————————————–

Regardless of what we learn, every twist and turn of this story becomes a more clear indication that the “Carolina Way” is clearly the way of doing anything to get/keep kids who break the rules eligible and on the field. We are yet to find a single instance in this sordid affair where UNC has voluntarily mandated a punishment to one of these kids that is beyond the bounds of what the NCAA required, would have required, or wasn’t tied to keeping ineligible players off the field to attempt to avoid the future vacating of wins.

Not once has there just been discipline for the sake of discipline. Not once has there been a suspension/expulsion because a kid did wrong and the Athletics Department chose to invoke some kind of LEADERSHIP in disciplining a kid for his decisions.

“There have been multiple issues [with Burney],” UNC athletic director Dick Baddour said Saturday at Scott Stadium. “We’ve been working on them for some time. We had hoped that all of those issues would be resolved by this time but that hasn’t happened unfortunately.

“It is possible that it will be resolved by the Miami game. It’s possible that it will be resolved favorably, and it’s possible that it will not be resolved favorably.”

How does one ultimately ‘resolve’ things that are blatantly wrong? Either the kid really screwed up with ‘multiple issues’ or he didn’t.

By Baddour’s own admission, Burney has had ‘multiple issues’. Instead of just putting down their foot and saying, “Enough is enough”…the administrators at UNC continue to show us the true “Carolina Way” — ‘no matter how much you screw up, we will NOT discipline you more than the NCAA might require. We don’t have standards that are any different than the bare minimum. We will use all of the resources of the department to find ways to help support student-athletes that break multiple rules across different issues – agents, academics, improper benefits, others?’

There is more about this tangential conversation here.

UNC Scandal

79 Responses to Update 8:30 pm – Added analysis from UNC blog on today’s Kendrick Burney PR fiasco

  1. StateFans 10/19/2010 at 4:11 PM #

    ANOTHER ONE that they would have gotten passed everyone if it weren’t for the kids talking to the media.

    Does WCTI’s deleting of the quote suddenly mean that he really didn’t say it?

    LOL!?!!?

    Nice integrity, media.

  2. newt 10/19/2010 at 4:16 PM #

    “The facts keep changing…”

  3. TAEdisonHokie 10/19/2010 at 4:16 PM #

    I’m starting to wonder if the earlier comment about Burney being “cleared” was launched as a trial balloon to see how the idea would be received.

  4. VaWolf82 10/19/2010 at 4:21 PM #

    I’m starting to wonder if the earlier comment about Burney being “cleared” was launched as a trial balloon to see how the idea would be received

    Nah…

    Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.
    Napoleon Bonaparte

  5. statered 10/19/2010 at 4:28 PM #

    I am sure that Burney opened his mouth and the folks doing the clearing got cold feet. If ever there was somehting to point out the need for an independent investigation this is it.

  6. sautz 10/19/2010 at 4:37 PM #

    Ha, I knew this couldn’t possibly be true. Sadly, it probably would have slipped right by Carolina’s strong institutional control.
    It was really funny reading IC celebrating this morning when he was supposedly going to be let back on the team after cheating, copping out with a F, and adding a class late into the semester. Celebrating that. I will never understand UNC-Cheat’s view of this problem. My only guess is that they really think they are a semi-pro team where players should get paid and academics ignored.

  7. ppack3 10/19/2010 at 4:38 PM #

    Still not resolved?! Sounds like he needed the credits this semester in order to play. Now he won’t enroll in another class this semester. Problem solved!

  8. bradleyb123 10/19/2010 at 4:44 PM #

    I’m starting to wonder if the earlier comment about Burney being “cleared” was launched as a trial balloon to see how the idea would be received.

    I’m not sure it was intentional. But I do wonder if this was in the works until they started feeling the heat from it, then realized it was not such a good idea after all. Because Burney sure seemed to think he was going to enroll in that class. He stated as much to a couple of media outlets, didn’t he?

    This would fit the incompetence theory suggested by VaWolf82, too.

    And if they really were considering letting Burney enroll at one point, it would reveal what their true goals are, and that is NOT to punish the wrongdoers, but rather to win football games.

  9. newt 10/19/2010 at 4:45 PM #

    Simple – media asks if any players have added a class this semester to become eligible.

    Not holding my breath…

  10. bradleyb123 10/19/2010 at 4:47 PM #

    Still not resolved?! Sounds like he needed the credits this semester in order to play. Now he won’t enroll in another class this semester. Problem solved!

    I thought the same thing, ppack! If he needed those credit hours, then he STILL needs those credit hours. And they ain’t lettin’ him in the class. So it would appear that he’s OUT!

  11. wolfpacker 10/19/2010 at 4:51 PM #

    This is the NORM at UNC…it’s been going on for YEARS!

    Finally the NCAA is going to figure it OUT! Hopefully they will see through the smoke and mirrors as they have been blinded for years and trusted the process. You couldn’t write a better script than what is about to unfold before your eyes…TRUTH IS STRANGER THAN FICTION and it’s about to be exposed and it’s wrath is coming.

  12. bradleyb123 10/19/2010 at 4:55 PM #

    This does make me wonder if the NCAA will be checking for any questionable activity like this for previous players. I’d be curious to know how far they are going in their investigation.

  13. newt 10/19/2010 at 5:04 PM #
  14. highstick 10/19/2010 at 5:16 PM #

    Ok, I’m gonna “splain this” to you younger guys…You add a course halfway through the semester…an ONLINE course!!! But, Butch’s paid tutors are gonna be very diligent and do all of that ONLINE course work for the player. No sweat, they can do it!!

    ONLINE!!! Think ONLINE! Who is going to monitor who is taking that ONLINE course!!! Bet he get’s an A!

  15. Hungwolf 10/19/2010 at 5:34 PM #

    Don’t you have to be full time student to qualify for ANY scholarship? Along with the other improper benefits, wonder if Burney will have to pay back his scholarship? Wonder if having a part time student on scholarship/football is a NCAA violation? Will UNC report this infraction?

    Also, Dear Mom and Dad,

    Thank you for sending your son to UNC to be part of the football team. Rest assured we making sure kids sign out when they leave campus, but don’t worry we not watching them on campus. We don’t know what classes they taking, who doing their homework, if they in class, or if they even got enough classes to be full time students, and no requirements to remember their teachers names or class names either. We wouldn’t want to distract them from football. Don’t send money either we got boosters, agents, and coaches for that.

    Thanks
    The Carolina Way Team

  16. packbackr04 10/19/2010 at 7:15 PM #

    where would the UNC scandal be if it werent for yahoo sports and SFN? they were obviously going to pull this crap until SFN pointed it out and obviously SFN gets a huge amount of traffic and UNC realized they couldnt pull the charade any longer.

    kudos to you guys, keep up the good work, if it was not for you, this scandal, and it is a scandal, would be all but over and the UNX football team would have had dozens of ineligible players on the field weeks ago. i bet they HATE you over on the hill. they dont have compliance officers at this point, they have a paid staff position to read your site to see which of their lies need to be cleaned up.

  17. packbackr04 10/19/2010 at 7:15 PM #

    love this site

  18. MatSci94 10/19/2010 at 7:18 PM #

    “Don’t you have to be full time student to qualify for ANY scholarship?”

    There is an exception in ‘full time student’ if you need less than (what is full time? 12 hrs?) to graduate. This was the Matt Leinart situation a few years ago where he only took Ballroom dancing or something like that because he had fulfilled his requirements.

    The problem is that, (presumably) one passed class turned into failed, and so now he needs one more class to graduate, so he becomes ‘not full time’ and probably triggers a bunch of academic warning/suspension issues.

  19. highstick 10/19/2010 at 7:25 PM #

    Did he “add” a course to offset the F he got in another for cheating? Now that would be an interesting way to circumvent the full time status issue?

    Think about it!

    My fear, and it appears to be happening is that their corrupt Honorless Court won’t do squat to those guys! That institution is corrupt from top to bottom, freshman to alumnus!

  20. choppack1 10/19/2010 at 7:39 PM #

    It will be interesting to see if the NCAA uses these cases as proof that UNC is NOT encouraging an atmosphere of compliance.

    The rumor on PP right now is that Carter and Sturdivant used the tutor while she was no longer employed at UNC – shouldn’t such a situation be monitored and possibly in the eyes of the NCAA – forbidden.

    Then there’s the punishment – it appears these guys are pretty much finding the field as soon as the NCAA “releases” them. To put it in a parent’s perspective – your kid gets suspended for stealing from the school’s cafeteria. You don’t do anthing major to the kid because the school’s “punished the kid enough”.

    Or put it a better way – you run an insurance agency and one of your agents is fined for breaking the rules regarding selling insurance…You let the guy pay the fine and go right back to selling insurance for your agency…that really sends a message that rule breaking won’t be tolerated doesn’t it?

    To be fair – they’ve lost 2 guys forever – Little and Quinn, likely Burney and Austin for their careers, McAdoo is gone for a long time too…so these guys are getting punished. The question is – is UNC cracking the whip or is the NCAA? If UNC is actively cracking this whip – they have learned their lesson…if this is coming down from the NCAA – they are not.

    Also, did anyone notice the timing of one of the latest suspensions and the NCAA saying they are looking at the academic angle? Again – if this is a case where UNC is missing stuff, they are really digging themselves a hole about as deep as you can dig it.

  21. StateFans 10/19/2010 at 8:40 PM #

    The NCAA has given Burney a waiver for the 12 hour minimum.

  22. Daily Update 10/19/2010 at 8:50 PM #

    ^Right because he needed less than 12 hours to graduate.

  23. choppack1 10/19/2010 at 8:58 PM #

    Does this mean that Burney is playing? Or is he still trying to find a class??

    And how bout UNC – so concerned about an athlete’s eligibility that they have him take THE BARE MINIMUM amount of classes to graduate? And how bout UNC allowing someone who cheated to graduate??

  24. PackWolf82 10/19/2010 at 9:09 PM #

    I read through all these comments and understand this situation a little differently than most on here as I’ve worked in Academic Support for Athletes at State and 2 other ACC schools, and work in Academic Advising at a nearby ACC school as I stated earlier in this thread….Most of you aren’t on the right track necessarily to what’s permissible for students to do and I guess athletes in some cases.

    The largest glaring discrepancy I see for Burney or any other player caught for cheating is this:

    How can someone who went before the Honor Court and was found guilty of cheating (via a tutor’s work for them) and given an F in that class, not be suspended for a whole semester? Meaning, you don’t play this semester because you are not a student. It wouldn’t matter if he’s in 12 hrs or 9 hrs. or whatever he was trying to add. He should be suspended in my professional opinion. I have not read their exact rules, but it seems they are bending them very blatantly to even give these guys the opportunity to get eligible. I know 2 individuals who did a lot less in a “cheating” manner and they were suspended at minimum for one semester, had to earn their way back in school then on the team.

    The Carolina Way is a mockery of a University setting at the very least.

  25. highstick 10/19/2010 at 9:22 PM #

    I always thought the “minimum of one semester” was the standard for both State and Carolina..or it was in the past anyway…You don’t get to finish the semester if it’s in the midst of the semester…I had a roommate at State that did it and that was the penalty, i.e. the balance of that semester and one more!

    Now what I cannot remember is what happened to the other courses he was taking…Granted it was an F in the course at issue, but can’t remember if he got incompletes or F’s on the others…That was a long time ago.

Leave a Reply