NC State takes on Maryland in crucial road test

2009_Tracy Smith_Maryland

While Wednesday night’s victory over Duke told NC State fans a lot about the ability and potential of the team, Saturday’s match up with Maryland in College Park may paint a clearer picture of what fans can expect the rest of the season.

A win against the Terps, who are currently 2-1 in the wacky ACC, and this team could get on a roll in the second half of the season and actually make some noise in conference. A loss could continue the roller coaster ride that Wolfpack fans have experienced to this point.

Testudo Times, a blog dedicated to covering all things Maryland, put together a great first look preview of Saturday’s game, even touching on the fact that NC State is a team that has people’s attention.

With the one-game vacay that was Longwood behind us, Maryland’s moving back to ACC play for a home game against North Carolina State, perhaps the most puzzling team in the ACC.

Had I written this preview two weeks ago, the entire tone would be completely different. That Wolfpack would’ve had losses to UVA and Northwestern at home, and a loss to a below-average Arizona team on the road. I would’ve called them a traditional Sid Lowe team: lots of talent, but still underachieving.

But things were recently starting to look up for the Wuffies. Remember, they only lost to a decent Florida team by one on a miracle shot. The Virginia loss looks better by the day. And they’ve performed extremely admirably the past two ACC games, beating Florida State in Tallahassee and only losing to a good Clemson team by 3.

And then, of course, they played Duke last night. Perhaps you heard of it? They completely outplayed the Dookies in every aspect of the game and walked away with a 14 point win.

And suddenly, this game becomes all the more scarier.

I must say it’s pretty cool to have outsiders recognizing the improvement going on in Raleigh. OK, enough of that.

There are several keys to Saturday’s game, but the most important, once again, will be how well NC State takes care of the ball. Against Duke Wednesday the lack of turnovers (nine total) allowed NC State to get quality possessions and looks at the basket throughout much of the night. The ability of the Wolfpack to hold onto the ball certainly helped the Pack shoot over 58 percent from the floor (still can’t really believe that stat).

NC State will also need to do try and limit Greivis Vasquez and his play-making ability. While the Wolfpack couldn’t stop Jon Scheyer from scoring Wednesday night, State did limit his ability to get others involved. That could be a good approach with Vasquez. Let him get his points but try to keep him from becoming an assist machine. In the two meetings with Maryland in 2009, the Wolfpack couldn’t quite get that done, allowing Vasquez to tally 50 points and 15 assists in two games.

Another important thing will be to get Tracy Smith involved early and often. The Terps aren’t particularly imposing inside so Smith could have another big game, or at least get the Terps in foul trouble if he’s aggressive early on.

Check out Backing the Pack for the normal statistical look at Maryland.

There will be a Live Blog during the game tomorrow. It should be live around 5:45 p.m. for a little pre-game talk before the tip at 6 p.m. If you decide to join us in the chat, be sure to have your sarcasm ready.

09-10 Basketball

25 Responses to NC State takes on Maryland in crucial road test

  1. Wolfy__79 01/23/2010 at 12:34 AM #

    well, i haven’t really been on here since pre-duke tip. people are awfully quick to dismiss NCSU, even ourselves. like the maryland fella said, we outplayed duke in every facet of the game. our shooting 58% helped for sure, and included some tough shots.. but we also got easy points. i expect us to continue getting easy buckets. so i believe we’ll have a pretty % throughout the season. true, md doesn’t have much strength with the low post.. before the duke win, i thought we match up against md a little better than with duke. while that hasn’t changed, one thing has. i’m interested to see how the boys will respond to a very emotional win.. hopefully they can just “brush their shoulders off” and play tough. vasquez is all people mention when it comes to md, if that is the case then i think we have a fairly decent chance at a win. preseason, i thought with him returning that they would standout in the league but i haven’t seen much to that affect. should be a tough road game, but i’m looking forward to another win.

  2. NJpack 01/23/2010 at 8:05 AM #

    Hopefully Degand’s quickness can contain Greivis. It will be huge if we pull off another road win, get to .500 in the ACC and have more confidence to face a struggling UNC team. Please don’t play CJ Williams, coach, Degand should be able to go 40 minutes.

  3. StateFans 01/23/2010 at 8:07 AM #

    I don’t understand how a ‘typical Sidney Lowe team’ has had lots of talent.

  4. TOBtime 01/23/2010 at 8:08 AM #

    I’m betting Degand gives Greivis a lot more NC State defense than he wants today.

  5. wolfbuff 01/23/2010 at 8:48 AM #

    Nobody’s going to hold Vadquez down. We don’t really have a lock-down defensive guy. Maybe with some good team defense, we can contain him. But he killed us twice last year pretty much by himself. The difference is in the other 4 players. And I think that’s where we have an edge. Either way, forget what’s on paper. It will come down to whether or not we play 40 min of solid basketball, like usual.

  6. TOB4PREZ 01/23/2010 at 9:01 AM #

    “Please don’t play CJ Williams, coach, Degand should be able to go 40 minutes.”
    ——————————————————
    that’s crazy talk…. Farnold won’t be worth a darn at the game’s end if he were asked to go 40mins. CJ provides us with some very solid minutes on the defensive end…. he’s long and “athletic enough” to stay with most 2s or 3s. While I think he’s a bit of a liability on the offensive end because he doesn’t give us another ball handler, I certainly think he’s serviceable enough to spell Farnold the needed minutes to keep him fresh.
    we need to dictate the play with our guard play again tonight, and probably show a little full court press to take the ball out of Greivis hands. this would be a huge win for us. GO PACK!

  7. RickJ 01/23/2010 at 9:05 AM #

    “Please don’t play CJ Williams, coach, Degand should be able to go 40 minutes.”

    Respectfully disagree with this statement. Over the past two years, fans have for good reason given up on Horner, Degand, Mays & Gonzales. Keep giving Williams a few minutes to try and play his way out of this funk – it appears to be mostly mental. This is a good game to put him in the game with the express purpose of defending Vasquez.

    Edit – TOB4PREZ – you beat me to this point.

  8. Dogbreath 01/23/2010 at 10:01 AM #

    McCullum should only see 5 minutes per game, and not in relief of Degand.

  9. haze 01/23/2010 at 11:08 AM #

    Agree on CJ… a continued upward trajectory for this team means getting CJ out of his funk. Degand, Javi and Mays have all been funked at some point on the year and have come back. CJ hasn’t come out yet, but it’s big for us if we can get him started.

    As for Vasquez, I think Davis could badger him pretty well if absolutely necessary. I don’t see anyone else on our club really slowing him down.

  10. theghost 01/23/2010 at 11:46 AM #

    It may be Wood – probably not as quick as vasquez, but pretty solid fundamentally. I bet we see him, Degand, and CJ all take a shot at him. Also like the idea of having Davis just wear his a$$ out. I hate vasquez as much as anybody in the conference now. He should be wearing blue.

  11. Clarksa 01/23/2010 at 12:53 PM #

    “I don’t understand how a ‘typical Sidney Lowe team’ has had lots of talent.”

    Yeah…my exact thought after reading that line…

  12. wolfonthehill 01/23/2010 at 1:08 PM #

    ^ Well, the team with JJ, Courtney, Ben, and Brandon had FAR more pure talent than the results we got out of them, and yes – more than this team has. I don’t think that part’s even debatable.

  13. choppack1 01/23/2010 at 1:22 PM #

    wolfonthehill – those guys were talented, but not in the same way that this group is. Everyone on this team understands their roles – and pretty much everyone has an acceptable back-up. Lowe’s playing Degand at the 2 spot has changed us to an athletic team. While Wood has had some brain farts, they are much fewer and far between than Fells were.

    This is the first of a 3 game series that could really point this program in a nice direction. We’re playing 3 opponents (UMd, UNC and UVa)- and we can beat all 3 if we play our game. Of course, we could just as easily lose all 3.

    Games like these have been the bugaboo of Lowe’s tenure. You win a big game – now you need to assert yourself against the teams you can beat if you bring your “A” game. So, come on guys, forget about Duke – and fight in this game like your life depends on it.

    The Duke win can serve as a springboard for an NCAA bid – or it can be like the other big regular season wins we’ve had w/ Lowe, where we lost our opportunity to turn the corner.

    Turning the corner can start tonight.

  14. triadwolf 01/23/2010 at 1:25 PM #

    I think with regard to talent, we looked good on paper to someone on the outside looking in – Fells, Grant, McCauly, Costner, Hickson, even Horner. Hell, everyone COULD score, but what didn’t show is how inept some of those players were with regard to certain skillsets and ,except for Astur (who was hurt most of Lowe’s first year), we never had a point guard. Our teams (mostly certain individuals) before this year were absolute turnover machines and when one or more of those players checked out (which was often), we were left dead in the water. Not to mention that there was really nobody off the bench.

    Only Hickson, McCauly, and Horner played to or close to their potential, and all but Hickson would have probably been roll players for most ACC teams. When someone from the outside looked at us once or twice a year they saw Fells, Costner, Grant & McCauly (Hickson for 1 year) who COULD all drop 20+ points on you. Of course they could (and often did) just as easily drop 2 or 4 and give up 10+ TO’s.

    We are probably less talented today than the previous two years (also taking into consideration experience), but we are exponentially better fundamentally, much more versitile, and are a much better TEAM. This year the parts actually add up to something.

  15. theghost 01/23/2010 at 1:28 PM #

    ^^^who was their PG? freshman Javi, right? if talent means athleticism, then you’re probably right relative to other Pack teams but not really superior relative to competition, but take JJ out and that squad is very pedestrian. Even so, that’s one year – hardly a characteristic of Lowe’s tenure.

    And to me, talent includes athleticism AND things like shooting ability and court saavy, and that’s where this squad closes the gap a little.

  16. NJpack 01/23/2010 at 1:41 PM #

    Good rebuttal regarding CJ Williams, I take back my comment. If he can break out of his funk he would be one more weapon for us. I like Davis as much as anybody, but if he can’t find his shot or make FT, he just can’t be out on the floor much in ACC play.

  17. dsgill87 01/23/2010 at 2:07 PM #

    I predicted a good showing (perhaps a win) over Duke, and said that if we lost by more than the spread (12) that we were regressing. A few reasons were that I thought Duke may look ahead to Clemson, our team was coalescing, and Duke had been banged up by Wake a couple days earlier.

    I’m not as optimistic for this game. After what we did Wednesday Maryland will be ready to play, they are well-coached, and most importantly, at home where they usually play a lot better in big games (and this is suddenly a big game). Vegas gives 5-7 points for home games… I would make this a pick on a neutral court, but I think Maryland wins by about 7. I don’t expect to get blown out because we haven’t all season and if we can neutralize Vazquez and not allow Maryland to control tempo and get on a 25-9 run then we have a good chance to win. With UNC looming, this is a mental test to see the guys fortitude and focus. This would be an acceptable loss in the ACC, so don’t act like the sky is falling if we can’t pull it out.

  18. primacyone 01/23/2010 at 2:17 PM #

    ” I like Davis as much as anybody, but if he can’t find his shot or make FT, he just can’t be out on the floor much in ACC play.”

    That one offensive rebound Davis got towards the end of the Duke game was worth every minute he got during the Duke game. It was him and three Dukies and he came out with it and gave us a fresh 35 seconds to milk off the clock. It was huge at the time.

  19. tractor57 01/23/2010 at 3:46 PM #

    Point being in the Duke game the team got some positives from all quarters. It was a team win rather than one person having a career night. I’m not discounting that Duke didn’t completely play up to their usual (they didn’t play awful either).

    Tonight is a new game so the team can build on the positives from the Duke game or they can suffer from the big win hangover.

    If the team is progressing like I hope they will build on the success.

  20. Rochester 01/23/2010 at 3:55 PM #

    After the job Wood did on Singler the other day I won’t be surprised to see him assigned to Vazquez to start out. But we’re going to need to put a couple of guys on him, maybe at a time, in order to slow him down. If we leave Eric Hayes open, though, he’s very dangerous from the perimeter. I like our advantage inside, but Vazquez scares the hell out of me. I’d much rather he were rotting on an NBA bench somewhere.

  21. wolfonthehill 01/23/2010 at 4:43 PM #

    I think we’re all saying the same thing, guys. In terms of raw talent, the team 2 years ago was pretty stout. Problem is – they were head cases, they didn’t play like a team, they were lazy & out of shape, and they refused to accept roles. But that team, should they have solved their chemistry problems, had a higher ceiling than this year’s squad, IMO… they just never came anywhere close to playing like a team & indeed got worse as the year progressed…

  22. wolfmanmat 01/23/2010 at 4:53 PM #

    I’m not sure that team was really all that talented. I mean, Hickson was/is talented. Costner was a McD’s, but he’s not even good enough to get drafted in the NBA, a league that will draft talent and not worry about attitude. Fells and McCauley are ACC role players. They all fit Herb’s system nicely, but I am not sure they were any more talented than the current squad. I take Tracy over ANY player on that squad.

  23. Gene 01/23/2010 at 5:21 PM #

    Fells was almost as highly ranked as Costner coming out of high school. Both were top-30ish prospects.

    Why Costner never built on the amazing performance in the ACC tournament, where he showed he had a ton of talent is one of the great mysteries of NCSU basketball.

    Fells is a good leaper and developed a decent jump shot, but never had an explosive first step he could use to blow by the man guarding him.

    I think some of the other teams had more talent in places, but lacked a PG, which sort of brought the whole team down.

    I hope we have the mental toughness to win this game on the road and don’t take things for granted. Maybe the pain of some our earlier losses will keep that from happening.

    Big thing that helped against Duke was the sudden deployment of a full court press, which caused some early turnovers. I don’t know if we can do that as effectively against Maryland, since the surprise factor won’t be there.

    I could ramble more, but game time’s almost at hand.

    GO PACK!!!

  24. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 01/23/2010 at 5:51 PM #

    Costner had the talent but he seemed to like biscuits and gravy more than he liked a chance at a NBA career. His nickname was “The Big Lazy” for Pete’s sake, there are not any NBA players with this kind of reputation

  25. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 01/23/2010 at 6:10 PM #

    Amazing how NC Stae has four fouls and Vasquez has yet to foul.

Leave a Reply