Russell’s Turn

The yelling had not even started to subside just a couple of hours after the Wolfpack’s big win over North Carolina when one of our authors was looking to next year with the a thread titled – “Cross Your Fingers That Baker and Wilson Stay”

Well, over the weekend we highlighted Toney Baker’s big award and discussed his potential return to the Wolfpack for the 2010 season. So, it is only fair to lead this morning with the Wolfpack’s other big personnel question mark for 2010 – Russell Wilson.

The ACC Sports Journal features the potential impact of Wilson decision on Mike Glennon in today’s version of their “Wolfpack Insider”.

Life without Russell Wilson is something N.C. State fans would rather not give much thought to, but it’s certainly weighing on the mind of Wolfpack coach Tom O’Brien.

Drafted by the Baltimore Orioles in 2006, Wilson more fits the prototype of a baseball player at 5-11 than an NFL quarterback. There is a belief that baseball is his primary love, as well. Thus, many people at NCSU, maybe even including O’Brien, think Wilson will opt for the national pastime after he’s drafted again next summer.

O’Brien said last week on his radio show that he doesn’t expect a decision from Wilson until after the baseball season. The determining factor may be how high Wilson is taken in the 2010 MLB Draft.

What if Wilson returns?

The Cardiac Pack Blog had a nice feature on Wilson’s pocket presence vs scrambling that is worth checking out here.

But for those of you who still believe the Wolfpack would be better off with Russell running around, take a look at some numbers. I am aware Russell missed time due to injury during the 2008 season, but even if you project his numbers for those games based on what he did the rest of the year it doesn’t add up.

[snip]

Russell’s numbers improved in every category other than interceptions. And to expect the same performance last year regarding interceptions was somewhat absurd. Turnovers happen in football.

And even with the fact that Russell ran less, he still netted 260 yards rushing, gaining an average of 21 yards per contest. In 2008 he only netted 388 (even though it felt like a lot more) yards with a little more than 35 yards per game. So all you people arguing that Russell should have run more this year are making your point based on 14 yards per game. Is that really worth the increased chance of injury?

We like to provide you a centralized place to click through to as much information related to a core topic as possible. With that said, this recent blog entry kind of hits on a lot of items facing the Wolfpack’s football program.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

'09 Football

29 Responses to Russell’s Turn

  1. Pack Mentality 12/07/2009 at 7:50 PM #

    Something about the numbers comparing RW this year to last year just doesn’t feel right. Just by gut instinct, I would say that RW was considerably better in rushing last year, probably in such a way that numbers alone can’t account for. But this could be hazy memory, and I have been wrong plenty of times before. Now onto the topic at hand, yes I definitely hope that RW plays football again next year, he is a proven gameday qb and Glennon isn’t.

  2. D_Medlin 12/08/2009 at 12:35 AM #

    GAWolf,

    I know stats aren’t everything, but his stats in key situations were better in 2009 than in 2008. The offense was more efficient on third downs, which as far as I’m concerned, is the most important part of “salvaging” drives. Whether he was running for first downs or throwing for them, N.C. State picked them up more often in 2009 than 2008.

    Now I agree that it felt like Russell did more in 2008, but I wonder if that’s because everyone is remembering several specific plays. There were a couple of season defining plays for Russell in both the Carolina and Miami games that I think people kind of latch onto when thinking about Russell Wilson in 2008. Just a thought…could be wrong.

  3. Mike 12/08/2009 at 12:19 PM #

    I dont have the stats here in front of me, nor the time to research them. Sacks count as rushing yards against the QB. The total yards are insignificant as pointed out in the post, but IF RW were sacked more frequently as a FR than a Soph, his total rushing yards might not be that different.

    I am saying I think he was more effective as a runner in FR year, but the stats could be misleading. He made many gamke changing, drive sustaining runs/scrambles last year that he did not this year. This year, he would scramble, keep his eyes up field, and usually find a receiver. The scrambling ability kept a lot of plays alive this year.

    And as much as I like the prospects of Mike Glennon, ANYONE wishing RW to leave so MG can his shot is a complete idiot. Let’s hope our best QB leaves early so the 2nd stringer does not transfer? Good grief…….I cannot even fathom that thought.

  4. SiriusPack 12/08/2009 at 8:51 PM #

    Glennon will have two seasons in the spotlight. I hope Russell returns.

Leave a Reply