Barry Saunders Mentions SFN In A Column About His Son

As I write this, it is on the keyboard of my laptop — the external one that I use was ruined when I spit out my coffee laughing out loud a few minutes ago.  I was reading the online edition of the Raleigh News and Observer, and came across local raconteur Barry Saunders’ column defending his beloved son Wesley.

It was the usual stuff, father taking son’s side, and probably deservedly so — Wesley Saunders had been accused by some fans at last week’s game of kicking a Wolfpack player, and Saunders asked some local reporters to interpret whether or not the “incident” actually occurred.  They said no, and Saunders wrote that.  Why it is anything beyond self-interest escapes me, that is, unless Saunders was up to his usual trick of trying to rile up NC State fans.  He’s a master of that, given his history through the years of stretching the truth to and sometimes past the breaking point when it comes to matters concerning NC State and its fans.  There, Saunders is a one-trick pony and he dips once again into his bottomless barrel of ink to refill his poison pen – and this time, Statefans Nation was indirectly mentioned:

[…] no third-party perspective is going to shut up people who read a Web site with the headline “Barry Saunders’ Son Wants an Unsportsmanlike Conduct Penalty.”

barry_saunders

That story prompted one fan with a decent sense of humor — which is what college sports calls for — to write “I wonder if Little Saunders has one of those ridiculously goofy hats like his dad?”

That was me who wrote that on these very pages, in the article entitled “Barry Saunders’ Son Wants an Unsportsmanlike Conduct Penalty.” And here’s where Ole Barry is up to his usual demagoguery where NC State is concerned: he poses the article I wrote as something that was partisan and colored with bias against South Carolina and his son Wesley. Thing is, the article posted here contained a direct quote from the Little Man himself:

“I’m going to talk to Coach (Steve) Spurrier beforehand and see if he’s OK if I get a 15-yard penalty,” Saunders said. “Because I’m gonna do some sort of extra celebration if I get a touchdown on the Wolfpack.”

That quote was posted by Saunders’ paper’s own Ken Tysiac, both in the ACC Now blog and the Charlotte Observer.

As for SFN’s readers and authors, one can only come to the conclusion that generally speaking we call it like we see it, good, bad or ugly.  And when we are wrong, we say we were wrong.  I personally think that’s why so many people choose to come here day after day and to participate in the never-ending discussion of all things Wolfpack.

In closing out his column, Saunders goes to his second-favorite pick, cherry-picking the worst comments he can come across to make NC State’s fans look like ignorant louts.  That’s one of his favorites, second only to claims of racist voice mails in response to a column he wrote.

“Chill, homes. There was no kick, although if I see some of the more obscene callers, there may be.”

The thing is, I didn’t see the play in question, but I will believe WRAL’s Jeff Gravely if he said that Wesley Saunders never kicked a Wolfpack player.  Even if the young man did kick a player in a scrum, I have seen worse acts in every level of football I have ever seen, all the way down to the 8-year old PeeWees that somehow talked their Moms out of playing soccer.  Football is a game of emotions, and in a close game like the NC State-USC affair last weekend, tensions can run high and emotions can flare red-hot.  Having played the game myself, I have done worse and had worse done to me to boot.  Anyone whose ever been at the bottom of a pile after a play can probably tell you tales of spit or fingers in the eye.  I won’t even describe for you the tender spots that get punched or worse, bitten.

That’s just football.

So either way, my reaction would have been “so frakking what.”  In all honesty, the penalty that wasn’t called that concerned me the most was the blatant facemask by a South Carolina defender — one that could have resulted in a horrible injury to his victim.  When the referees didn’t call that, I started looking for their guide-dogs and white canes.  Obviously, they were blind. As is Barry Saunders, apparently.  He is so blinded by his hate for all things NC State — he is an admitted UNC partisan — that he cannot see that the vast majority of Wolfpack fans are honorable and passionate people who pull for their favorite team with a fervor.  That’s respectable in my eyes, while constantly stretching the truth is not, by any means.

'09 Football Editor's Picks Headscratchers Media

30 Responses to Barry Saunders Mentions SFN In A Column About His Son

  1. 44rules 09/11/2009 at 1:08 AM #

    Please don’t take this as being supportive of Saunders in any way shape or form. But I’m a hat guy. I like the hat. I like nothing else, but I like the hat.

  2. Wufpacker 09/11/2009 at 5:41 AM #

    Keg Man said:
    “Oh the flip side — article did make this site look kinda dumb? Sorry but it was not good for the site.”

    How, exactly, does this article make the site “look kinda dumb”? Is it because Saunders tries to denigrate the site for using the headline “Barry Saunders’ Son Wants an Unsportsmanlike Conduct Penalty”? Based on the quoted statements from Weslye Saunders, which I have not heard disputed, the headline is appropriate and accurate.

    I read nothing in the so-called “article” that would lead me to the conclusion that the site looks “dumb” or “not good” as a result.

    On the contrary, Mr. Saunders’ use of inane slang terms in a piece meant for publication, both on the web and presumably in print, does lower one’s impression of HIS intellect. It must have taken him hours to come up with “Aw shaddup, punks” (I better watch it…I’ve probably just come perilously close to racism, as defined by Saunders). Not to mention the rash of misspellings in the first version of the piece (it was updated about 8 hours later…I guess it took him that long to figure out how to use spellcheck).

    Nevermind the fact that his choice to pen an article about such subject matter (perceived slight to his family member) is questionable to begin with. Something like this can’t be dealt with without having some level of bias. The bias is understandable, its human nature. To believe that one can write a piece like this without that bias factoring into the equation, however, is the problem. Journalistic integrity, and so on and so forth. But then again, he’s never been worried about that before, so why start now?

    And why the need to contact not one, but two local sports journalists to ask them to review the footage and report back to him? He states he saw with his own eyes, both live and on replay, that no kick had occurred. And, even if he did still have a slight uncertainty, why not call the little rascal, Weslye, himself and ask him directly. I mean, surely the kid wouldn’t lie about it…its not as if he was an NC State fan, after all.

    What I have to ask myself is, after hearing that some fans thought his son had kicked an opposing player, was the elder Saunders’ motivation to find the truth the result of parental concern, or perhaps more a product of the hope that he could sit himself down and hammer out a nice little piece that would, once again, paint NC State fans in an unflattering light. The simple fact that the published article exists answers that question quite convincingly.

  3. wolfpackdawg 09/11/2009 at 9:48 AM #

    Oh snap….Murray State 49 Pack 17

    Wesley Saunders scores 3 TD’s against the DAWGs and promptly kicks UGA VII off of his bag of ice.

  4. primacyone 09/11/2009 at 9:59 AM #

    Here is a link to a video of the play in question:

    http://s180.photobucket.com/albums/x125/Otis4411/uncjokes4411/?action=view&current=NCState.flv

    Doesn’t look like a kick, but it was very thoughtful of Barry to use his son to sell some newspapers and get some clicks.

    Since Barry is considerdate enough to have had his son call and apologize if it had been a kick, maybe he could have his son speak to the player that almost took Rashard’s head off on that punt return. Or maybe he could write something about that to sell some newspapers and get some clicks. Be interesting to see if Barry thought the no-call face mask/personal foul was the right or wrong call.

    I will give Barry some positive props for being there for his son. That’s a good example to portray in a media atmosphere.

  5. WolftownVA81 09/11/2009 at 1:10 PM #

    From the article “There was no kick,” Gravley said. “The Wolfpack player was holding onto his leg after the play was over, and Wes kicked away from the guy. He was trying to shake the guy off his leg.” The cameraman who reviewed his tape said the same thing a day later. So there.”

    Sounds like Gravely is reading little Saunders mind. How can you conclude what his his real intentions were? To which I say, one mans kicking away is another man’s being kicked at.

    Slow news at the N&O? Time to move on to more football.

Leave a Reply