Another morning, another front page embarrassment for Oblinger, NC State

It’s another morning in the Carolinas, so that can only mean that there is another development in the “NC State-Mary Easley case.”

Today’s front page story – Feds probe Easley hiring – is particularly damning because it represents an inquiry directly into ‘official’ dealings between the University.

Federal prosecutors Tuesday ordered the chancellor and provost at N.C. State University to appear before a grand jury this week, making it clear that investigators have opened a wide-ranging criminal probe of dealings surrounding former Gov. Mike Easley.

The FBI served subpoenas to Chancellor James Oblinger on Tuesday afternoon as he left the main administration building, Holladay Hall, to appear at an event across campus.

“This university will do everything to cooperate fully,” Oblinger said.

Investigators want to talk with Oblinger and Provost Larry Nielsen about the hiring, promotion and salary of former first lady Mary Easley, according to the court documents.

Sheesh. How embarrassing can it get? Our Chancellor was publicly served a federal subpoena at the administrative buildings of our University. Just allow that to sink in for a minute.

You really can’t read this entry with reading this one where we provide our commentary and the community engages in a fantastic conversation.

Additionally, this editorial was printed in the Charlotte Observer this morning (so, I presume it was also in the News & Observer). It gives a nice, quick rundown while leaving out the part where Easley’s pay went from about $80,000 a year to $170,000 a year during her employment.

This whole deal, like others swirling around it, smells bad. The governor’s wife lands a high-paying job to run a campus speaker series and public safety center. The interim provost who gives her the job suddenly becomes permanent provost despite not being a candidate for the job. And the school’s board chairman is a buddy of then-Gov. Mike Easley’s who does favors for the governor and gets help from the Easley administration around the time Mrs. Easley is landing the job.

The provost, Larry Nielsen, and the chairman, McQueen Campbell, have resigned. Mary Easley must do the same – now. Her continued presence can only hurt N.C. State.

That won’t end this mess, though. Questions remain for Oblinger. He and Nielsen have been summoned to testify before a federal grand jury. Campbell says he told Oblinger about Mary Easley’s interest in changing jobs, Bowles says, but Oblinger claims not to remember anything about it. And it’s becoming apparent that Bowles didn’t ask enough questions when Mrs. Easley was hired, when he fully supported the arrangement.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

NC State Administration

61 Responses to Another morning, another front page embarrassment for Oblinger, NC State

  1. GAWolf 05/20/2009 at 12:59 PM #

    We’re Opus Dei University, that’s for certain.

  2. packplantpath 05/20/2009 at 12:59 PM #

    I hear from most corners of CALS that Oblinger is very well regarded by the faculty. They see him as an advocate for the agricultural research within CALS, so there is definitely a conflict of interests. The biggest complaint here seems to be that he is not a politician.

    My question is, do we really want a politician running the university? I think the politicizing of university decisions is the bigger issue, and in that system Oblinger probably fares poorly. But, should it be that way? Should the politicians and lawmakers really have that much influence over the university? Shouldn’t we have a chancellor who is more than an administrator and actually understands the research and how grant funding works?

    I have heard, on two occasions from two different people in administrative positions, “This wouldn’t be a bad place to work, if it wasn’t for the students”. They seem to have forgotten that, while this is a research university, it wouldn’t be what it is without the students. A friend who worked in the chancellors office heard such statements made on a regular basis. So, don’t get me wrong, I’m not defending Oblinger, these attitudes start at the top. But politics should have no input in the running of the university, and until that changes, nothing really changes.

  3. StewMan07 05/20/2009 at 1:19 PM #

    The point here is that the top officials at the university knew about a fairly questionable hire, and then have since lied about what they knew. Oblingers credibility is shot. It’s time to clean house and get rid of all the dirty bastards and get some people in there that will handle themselves and the university with the utmost respect it deserves. It’s time to get someone who will demand excellence, academically, athletically, and from students and staff. That is a lot to balance, and that is why it requires someone who has leadership and charisma, but is accessible to the university and is in touch with the pulse of the university. This is something our academic and athletic administration have not made an effort to do in quite a while. I for one would love to have a MAF type back to ruffle the feathers of the good ole boys, it’s time to change the culture at NC STATE from the ground up, and until we do, we can expect more of the same with regards to stuff like this and mediocrity being acceptable. We are the largest university in the state, it’s time to stand up and act like it!

  4. WolftownVA81 05/20/2009 at 1:20 PM #

    packplantpath, even if you don’t want to play ball with the politicians, you have to be savy enough to know the risks. Ignoring what’s going on around you is as bad as activly participating. We need a strong leader who will defend his decisions and stick to his guns when his gut tells him something stinks. To use a biblical reference, he is neither hot nor cold and deserves to be spit out.

  5. Trout 05/20/2009 at 1:31 PM #

    “They see him as an advocate for the agricultural research within CALS, so there is definitely a conflict of interests.” – packplant

    How is Oblinger advocating for ag research deemed a conflict of interests?

  6. newt 05/20/2009 at 1:39 PM #

    Oblinger should negotiate Easley’s resignation and sack Fowler this week while making some ambigious statements about a time of transition and progress. He would be wildly popular.

  7. Sam92 05/20/2009 at 1:42 PM #

    it is sad that all of this nonsense probably gives lee fowler more job security. all the shake up is connected to Mary Easley, and that has nothing to do with lee. with all of the resignations going on around that, it is rather unlikely that anyone *not* connected to the easley situation will be fired, it will be don’t rock the boat for a while. too bad.

  8. packplantpath 05/20/2009 at 1:46 PM #

    Sorry Trout,

    Didn’t mean for that to be confusing. CALS faculty support for Oblinger could be due to his support of CALS and not related to his (Oblinger’s) job performance.

    I don’t believe it is the case, but it could be interpreted as a “know who butters your bread” type support. He is a vocal supporter of the mission of CALS, as he should be. Were he less vocal in support of CALS, they could be more likely to speak up if they had a problem with his leadership.

    I think (I have no proof of this at all) it was mostly CALS faculty that wanted M A Fox gone, and Oblinger’s hire placated those concerns. But, lets put it this way, if he was an opponent of what they do, I guarantee they would speak up early and often.

    Frankly, I would expect every chancellor to have a very high regard and support of ag research at NC State since it is one of the main research goals of the university. In the same way, the Chancellor at UNC should have a very high support of medical research.

  9. StateFans 05/20/2009 at 2:14 PM #

    Can someone please share with me why Marye Ann Fox was censured by the faculty?

    How do her transgressions compare to Oblingers?

  10. BJD95 05/20/2009 at 2:19 PM #

    Stepping on tenured toes = censure.

    Two-plus weeks of humiliating front page headlines and an FBI probe = no problem.

  11. bradleyb123 05/20/2009 at 2:22 PM #

    Forget the image aspect of this for just a moment. From a purely ATHLETICS perspective, does an administrative shake-up like this (from the top down) mean anything for athletics? I mean, could we possibly remove all the rats at the top and the BOT, and replace them with some that (heaven forbid!) actually give a damn about athletics?

    And if there is still anything going on behind the scenes with removing Fowler, is all that on the backburners now? What affect does all this have on Fowler? Or is he likely the big winner in all this, since the BOT and chancellor all seem to have “bigger fish to fry” now?

    I’d like to remove the entire lot of them, and hope to get some people in that care enough about athletics to dump Fowler.

  12. packplantpath 05/20/2009 at 2:28 PM #

    I seem to remember some controversy with Fox over the firing of some provost or the other……Details escape me though.

  13. packalum44 05/20/2009 at 2:32 PM #

    Oblinger is as clean as they come. You’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t at NC State. He has his faults but I don’t think integrity is one of them, despite this overblown headline. If the worst he’s done is passively allow Easley to be hired without due process (or whatever you want to call it…still puzzled as to what the BIG issue is…he didn’t actually do the hiring or create the position right?), I think he’ll make his way through the pearly gates alot easier than myself.

    I can guarantee that if this happened at another university the VAST majority of alumni would be like, “WTF? So what…we’re fighting 2 wars and the economy sucks, unemployment is 10% and Nancy Pelosi is running Washington. What’s the big deal?” Its preposterous and laughable that the feds are getting involved. That’s Mike’s doing, not NC State. He must have done some seriously sketchy shit and the heat will soon shift back on him.

  14. wufpup76 05/20/2009 at 2:32 PM #

    “Two-plus weeks of humiliating front page headlines and an FBI probe = no problem.”

    Sounds like another “Leadership / Excellence” Award is in order here. Maybe this one can be given out by CMA Bowles.

  15. packplantpath 05/20/2009 at 2:33 PM #

    Maybe this will refresh some memories, though I admit it hasn’t helped mine much….
    http://students.ncsu.edu/sgims/documents/PDF/minutes/02-m1043886600sen.pdf

  16. GoldenChain 05/20/2009 at 2:41 PM #

    “I’m sure when he handed it over in the 80s he gave us a wink and the secret Skulls Fraternity handshake.”
    LOL
    He is a member of the Golden Chain!

  17. packheelbuffalum 05/20/2009 at 3:07 PM #

    “Can someone please share with me why Marye Ann Fox was censured by the faculty? How do her transgressions compare to Oblingers?”

    The NCSU Faculty Senate censured Fox after she fired two top administrators. The Provost had refused to do so, and then quit in protest of her actions.

    The Senate Censure Resolution cites her for unfairness, incivility, and usurping the Provost’s authority.

    The resolution can be found here: http://ncsu.edu/faculty_senate/resolutions/2002-2003/resolution-6-2001-2002.php

    A relevant N&O article may be found here: http://www.newsobserver.com/438/story/409367.html

    As I recall, based on conversations at the time with NCSU faculty, faculty members generally liked her vision for NCSU, but did not like her style. She did have considerable success changing her style after the censure, as the N&O story relates.

    So, I see Fox’s problems as an internal matter, really one of faculty governance.

    Oblinger’s problems seem quite different, caught up in questions of political corruption.

  18. burnbarn 05/20/2009 at 4:09 PM #

    Nice letter to the editor in today’s N and O signed by 5 deans at NCSU expressing support for Neilsen.. they said he did such a great job as interium that they asked that he be considered as a permanant Provost. These 5 deans feel he was doing a great job and that this is a bad thing for NCSU.

  19. bigjohn 05/20/2009 at 4:11 PM #

    Easy dudes…… this job was created to fit Mary Easley. The speakers were mostly related thru the Clinton cabinet when Mr. Bowles was chief of staff. It’s pretty ludicrous to think that the chancellor’s administrative staff could’nt have invited these same “individuals that only Mary Easley had access to” to speak for $$$$$$ with a letter or an email. I think the chancellor and the system president are trying to distance themselves as much as possible, but they approved the whole deal through the UNC System Board of Governors as soon as the news broke last year. Let it play out through the investigations, but the whole bunch should go. If Erskine or Obie were going to get all torn up about it, it would have been back then.

  20. bigjohn 05/20/2009 at 4:30 PM #

    I have heard good things about Neilson, as well, but he didn’t resign that easily because he was an innocent bystander. He came by his position in an unusual turn of events that were outside the normal hiring procedure. It all smells!

  21. Rick 05/20/2009 at 4:33 PM #

    Is it me or does this not reflect poorly on the two degrees I earned at NCSU.
    That means all of the hard earned money both my parents and I (plus the untold number of hours) I invested into this university are getting a return equivalent to the stock market of the past year.

  22. phunisher 05/20/2009 at 4:34 PM #

    This link should be on a more basketball relevent post, but I thought it would get more exposure on this hot topic.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/recruiting/classrankings?classyear=2009&classmonth=5&rank=11

  23. Gene 05/20/2009 at 4:35 PM #

    “For Obie, I recommend he not tell the Grand Jury “I can’t remember”. It didn’t work for the watergate dudes ”

    Worked for Reagan, Alberto Gonzalez, and Sg.Shultz, etc…worth try, if you don’t know what to do…

    “I have heard, on two occasions from two different people in administrative positions, “This wouldn’t be a bad place to work, if it wasn’t for the students”. They seem to have forgotten that, while this is a research university, it wouldn’t be what it is without the students.”

    Undergrads aren’t the criteria for how professors get tenure and get promoted. This sort of conflict between faculty and students, from what I’ve seen, exists at most large universities.

    The only thing I don’t get about the hiring of Mrs. Easley is the fact, from whatever accounts I’ve read, she has done a good job in her position. I’m not sure what the speakers series she works with involves and how the duties might compare to other university employees in similar positions, so I don’t know if she was overpayed or not.

    What’s really sad is there’s a hardcore politican, Erskine Boles, running the UNC system and I don’t think we have anyone with the political savvy to make sense of this apparent problem.

    The issue really is about Gov. Easley and improperly taking gifts. I don’t see how hiring his wife, to a job, she seems to be doing well at is anything improper on the face of it.

    The university, unfortunately, is doing nothing to put up a defense and Oblinger’s boss, Boles, is letting Oblinger twist in the wind, so long as Boles’ doesn’t get his hands dirty.

    What upsets me most about this is there isn’t a lot of actual bad doings by NCSU, yet we’re made to look like the villain in all of this. The people in charge are being played and scapegoated by more savvy politicians and our administration is “falling on their swords”, in defense of higher ups.

    As far as I’m concerned NCSU hired Mrs. Easley who has done a good job for the position she was hired in. Maybe she’s paid too much. I don’t know what the salary for that position is, but it’s not like she’s contributed nothing for the money we’ve paid her.

    I don’t know if her hiring or raise played a role in anyone else getting jobs, but if pressure was put on anyone to promote someone to Provost or the BoT, those decisions had to be made by Boles and the other people in the UNC system and isn’t exclusive to only NCSU administrators.

    Why we’re taking the rap for this is wrong. Why we aren’t fighting back is even more wrong.

  24. primacyone 05/20/2009 at 4:42 PM #

    “I think the chancellor and the system president are trying to distance themselves as much as possible, but they approved the whole deal through the UNC System Board of Governors as soon as the news broke last year.”

    Ding, Ding, Ding. Looks like Obie and Erskine are triying to put everyting on Neilson.

    Looks like everything was A okay from a state of NC perspective, but the feds have a different opinion and have issued an all out assault on Mike Easly.

    Wonder if they will call Erskine to the Grand Jury? He’s an obvious squeeler. Wonder what else they may uncover. This could get a lot bigger. I mean hell, this could get bigger than the former speaker of the house’s mess.

  25. bigjohn 05/20/2009 at 4:43 PM #

    Rick, Nothing reflects poorly on any earned degrees. Our image is only as high as we hold it to ourselves. If the alumni don’t see or believe how great the school is, then why should we think that anybody else would? These guys didn’t go to class for you or take your exams. Let them get what they are due, or be proved innocent.

Leave a Reply