UNC Preview

This preview is actually a compilation of several different previews. We’ll start with the perspective of the same UNC fan that we heard from earlier in the week.

UNC SCOUTING REPORT

Offense – Getting worse each week.

UNC has a below average run game and can’t seem to find a running back. About four different ones have been used this year, but it seems now that Johnny White and Anthony Elzy are getting most of the carries. White had a solid game against Maryland, and Elzy played well against Va. Tech and Miami, but neither does anything particularly well and should not scare the Pack. UNC usually runs the ball well for a drive or two a game, but can’t seem to sustain it for four quarters.

The passing game is average. TJ Yates has done fairly well at QB, though he has leveled off after a hot start. He throws a good deep ball, but also has a penchant for poor decisions and interceptions. Hakeem Nicks is a great receiver and is the number one target – he’s both a possession receiver and deep threat. Brandon Tate (WR/KR) is UNC’s best all-around athlete and the Heels will try to get him the ball via the pass and the run.

Defense – Getting better each week.

UNC plays a very conventional 4-3. The Heels don’t do much blitzing and play fairly straight up. The front four is the strength with a number of talented players, including seniors Hilee Taylor and Kentwan Balmer and freshman Marvin Austin. The run defense is solid, and the Heels held Maryland (a usually good rushing team) to 93 yards Saturday.

Durrell Mapp, a senior middle linebacker, is one of the ACCs leading tacklers, but the other linebackers have yet to standout. The secondary has two very good safeties in Tremaine Goddard and Deunta Williams, but the corners are young and somewhat unproven.

Special teams – The Heels are in great shape at kicker (Connor Barth has only missed 1 FG in his last 21 games), punter, and kick returns. The weakness has been kickoff return coverage, as the Heels have given up a number of backbreaking returns this year.

Bottom line – First team to 20 wins. I say neither team gets there but that State pulls out a 17-13 win.

CFN OUTLOOK

Hit this link and scroll down to the State-UNC preview.

What Will Happen: Now we see why NC State wanted Tom O’Brien. He has it going and continues the post-season march with a big victory thanks to timely offense and just enough D to get by.

CFN Prediction: NC State 28 … North Carolina 23… Line: NC State -3.5

Note that even though CFN lists the game as being on ESPNU, the ACC website has it on Raycom/Lincoln Financial.

BY THE NUMBERS

Proving that great minds think alike, Steven at Section Six compiled some total offensive and defensive numbers against the three common opponents (ECU, UVa, and Miami). Luckily for State fans, those three games represent the only ones worth remembering so far this year.

The bottom line is that there is very little difference in the numbers between State and UNC. From these three games, it looks like UNC’s offense is a little better and State’s defense is a little better.

TURNOVERS

Draw your own conclusions from the games against common opponents:

 

Fumbles

INT

Total

 

Lost

 

TO’s

NCSU

1

1

2

ECU

1

1

2

 

UNC

1

1

2

ECU

0

0

0

 

NCSU

0

1

1

UVA

0

2

2

 

UNC

2

1

3

UVA

0

0

0

 

NCSU

0

0

0

Miami

0

3

3

 

UNC

1

0

1

Miami

0

4

4

 

 

 

 

WINNER

 

 

MY TAKE

Though both teams have shown improvement over last year, neither team can afford to make more mistakes than their opponents and still win. I’m betting that the team that makes either the most mistakes or possibly the last mistake will lose.

About VaWolf82

Engineer living in Central Va. and senior curmudgeon amongst SFN authors One wife, two kids, one dog, four vehicles on insurance, and four phones on cell plan...looking forward to empty nest status. Graduated 1982

'07 Football

61 Responses to UNC Preview

  1. GAWolf 11/08/2007 at 9:30 PM #

    The game is going to come down to (as it has the last 6 I’ve attended) only two things:

    1) Will we get outhustled by the less-talented Tarheels (I can’t remember a game win or lose against the heels where we weren’t physically manhandled despite having supposedly the better ahtletes – so that goes to hustle and self-respect.)

    2) Can we avoid the break out game by that unheralded Carolina player who inevitably has his career night against us? (That goes for both sports, mind you.)

    NOAH: Quite frankly, it baffles me how either fanbase can muster the audacity to talk smack prior to this game. It simply blows my mind… the Pack could come out and play like they have the last three games, but we could also go out there and lay a big ugly egg.

    CAN SOMEONE LOOK UP EUGENE’S RUSHES THIS YEAR AND BROWN AND BAKER’S RUSHES THIS YEAR AND FIGURE OUT THE RATE AT WHICH EACH FUMBLES? I heard a good point today on the radio that Eugene holds onto the ball where the other two have a knack for the dropsies. Can this be supported by the numbers? If so, it answers a lot of my questions on where the recent success is coming from. Thanks.

  2. GAWolf 11/08/2007 at 9:32 PM #

    Obviously the turnover margin in geneeral has been significant in our recent success… but I’m looking at our running backs in particular.

  3. blpack 11/08/2007 at 9:35 PM #

    If we don’t beat ourselves, we will win. They will have a few plays, but Barth will have to kick 10 FGs to keep them in the game. Pack pulls away in the second half.

    Pack 33
    UNC-CH 12

  4. highstick 11/08/2007 at 10:12 PM #

    Noah, they think they “own us like slaves” and “will be us like a dog”! You know that! That’s the “Tar Heel Way”!

  5. john of sparta 11/08/2007 at 10:28 PM #

    Noah wins again…it’s a “pick ’em game”.
    and GaWolf is right. it happens.
    if you get points either way=take ’em.

  6. choppack1 11/08/2007 at 10:46 PM #

    Actually – the Heels can talk smack simply because they’ve won 3 in a row…And it this game, the talent distribution is more even than it’s been since the OT game or maybe 2001.

    I’m worried about this game. I think the Heels have a pretty good D. On offense, they have enough weapons to put some points on the board. Walker’s injury is huge since his size and athleticism would have been huge against their big and fast receivers. Hopefully, Leonard will play a solid game fundamentally – keeping their dangerous receivers in front of him- forcing the Heels to make long, sustained drives.

    Our OL will need to give Evans enough time to pick on undermanned secondary.

    On D, we’ll need to pressure Yates and stop the run.

    If we do those things and don’t lose the TO battle -we’ll win.

    Of course, those 3 things are a tall order. I’m a little worried that we’re “due” to lose a TO battle.

    Here’s hoping that TOB’s style will have these guys terribly hungry at noon to destroy the Heels.

  7. tvp1 11/08/2007 at 11:21 PM #

    “I see State having a slight edge at the moment.”

    If Noah says that…then that means we should win by 20 🙂

  8. EverettBeez 11/08/2007 at 11:33 PM #

    I really really hope Noah is right.
    I am almost afraid to be confident.
    I would love to see everyone in red, I’ll be wearing red tomorrow and saturday.
    be awesome to hear the fans chanting during the pre-game:
    Beat Carolina
    Beat Carolina
    Beat Carolina

    its a nice, simple statement that even drunks (who will be trying to get in) can do.

  9. MatSci94 11/08/2007 at 11:38 PM #

    “CAN SOMEONE LOOK UP EUGENE’S RUSHES THIS YEAR AND BROWN AND BAKER’S RUSHES THIS YEAR AND FIGURE OUT THE RATE AT WHICH EACH FUMBLES?”

    from the stats on gopack (espn stats didn’t have fumbles. Well, they had a slot for the stat but all of ours were 0 for the past three seasons.)

    Brown 345 rushes – 6 fumbles – 1.74 %
    Baker 291 rushes – 4 fumbles – 1.37 %
    Eugene 129 rushes – 2 fumbles – 1.55 %

    stats from 05-07, except for Eugene, who played only last year and this year. I didn’t get receptions, but should have.

    Baker had 4 in 05, but only 2 last year. Eugene been very good at holding onto the ball recently (esp with 70 carries in 3 games) but I remember him being fumble prone earlier, but I don’t see that in the numbers (if these are reliable)

  10. wolfman 11/08/2007 at 11:44 PM #

    I am with GaWolf. 63-27-6 is our record against the baby blue buttholes I believe. Many of those times we were favored to win, and yet still found a way to lose, and in fact, show our asses along the way. Last year in particular comes to mind, what with our players coming out talking smack about sending Bunting packing. Oh, the irony. So, with that in mind I never have the audacity to talk smack until after we beat those baby blue beotches, because quite frankly they own us.

  11. EverettBeez 11/09/2007 at 12:15 AM #

    ^ exactly wolfman, exactly.

  12. WestCoast 11/09/2007 at 12:32 AM #

    Look for a large game from Marcus Stone…IMO. He’s due and why not against Carolina.

    State 31-16

  13. Mike 11/09/2007 at 1:18 AM #

    I was bouncing around the web and saw bowl predictions. Think it was Fox, but they are projecting us for the Potato Bowl on Smurf turf. Am I exicted about the blue field? Not normally, but considering where we were a couple weeks ago, I think we would all be pleased with the projected bid. Looks like some writers are starting to believe.

  14. WolfAce 11/09/2007 at 2:05 AM #

    So tonight UNC-CH’s campus in general and multiple dorms got an earful of the fight song and ‘red and white’ multiple times up close and personal from some random bunch of state fans who happen to have trumpets and know the fight songs 😉

    and let me just say this, it got a lot of people out of the dorms and riled up, some of them were pretty angry, hinton james actually felt the need for a TAR…………….HEEL chant after they got hit from behind and then got the full fight song and red and white from the top of the parking deck across from them

  15. MrPlywood 11/09/2007 at 2:20 AM #

    I will NEVER admit to being owned, least of all by Carolina.

  16. noah 11/09/2007 at 10:51 AM #

    If Carolina fans want to talk junk about the last three years or about winning seven in a row in the 90s, that’s fine. I don’t understand why they are talking junk about THIS game.

    I’ve seen nothing from UNC this year that warrants smack talk. And yes, the same can be said from NC State. If this was just junk from college kids, that might explain it…but this is coming from adults.

    BTW, Vegas agrees with me. They’ve got the good guys by three.

  17. PamlicoPack 11/09/2007 at 11:12 AM #

    does Charlotte pick 5th or sixth among the ACC bowl slots? I don’t understand all these Pack to idaho predictions. We travel well enough that we will either get the bowl in Nashville/Charlotte, or we won’t go to a bowl at all. I don’t see Boise or San Fran. as possibilities….

  18. PamlicoPack 11/09/2007 at 11:36 AM #

    ^
    to clarify, I mean, IF we manage to win out to 7-5 (and I think the chances are remote, but not impossible), we will end up in Charlotte or Nashville. I think at 6-6 we won’t go bowling, unless some wierd things happen to the teams above us.

  19. newt 11/09/2007 at 11:57 AM #

    UNC’s strength is their receivers. UNC’s weakness is their secondary.

    This game will have big pass completions and/or interceptions.

    The team that completes the big pass will win and the team that throws the interceptions will lose.

  20. RickJ 11/09/2007 at 12:39 PM #

    Here is a statistical anomaly I would like to see change on Saturday – In our eight games this year against Division 1 opposition; our opponents have fumbled the ball 12 times. Amazingly, we have only recovered 1 of those fumbles (against ECU). Here’s to State recovering a couple of fumbles tomorrow to go along with 2 or 3 picks.

  21. noah 11/09/2007 at 1:13 PM #

    I have to think that fumble recoveries, unlike interceptions, are purely luck.

  22. TopTenPack 11/09/2007 at 1:36 PM #

    The N&O linked to this article from the preview of the UNX games. Nice work SFN!

    Now, when are you going to let capitalism in and start with some adds at the bottom?

  23. foz 11/09/2007 at 2:45 PM #

    My predictions (not that anyone cares): in chronological order

    NCSU FG
    NCSU TD
    UNC FG
    NCSU FG

    Halftime NCSU13 UNC 3

    UNC FG
    NCSU FG
    UNC FG
    NCSU FG

    Final NCSU 19 UNC 9

  24. PamlicoPack 11/09/2007 at 5:12 PM #

    I’ll predict NCSU 23, UNC 16 with one defensive or special teams TD for the Pack.

  25. Ismael 11/09/2007 at 6:00 PM #

    ECU and UVa are both better teams than UNC…i didn’t think UNC was gonna hang close to WFU, thought they’d beat or lose close to UMD…i honestly think we should win by more than 10pts. The product that’s been on the field for the last 3 weeks for the wolfpack has been good. We have a damn good D. Walker is gone but he was gone for alot of the UM game so whoever filled in for him did well. Just look at the last 3 weeks of 2nd half football, its beautiful from a Def. standpoint.

    NCSU 30, UNC 12

Leave a Reply