Valentine: Diva of the College Game

We discussed at length the Ted Valentine situation at the Final Four. You should click here.

Yesterday, ESPN’s Pat Forde used the insane Tim Duncan vs Joey Crawford situation to spark a great column on basketball officials. The entire column can be read here (along with video).

Some selected passages from the piece are included below:

2. The Final Four travesty in Atlanta.
Three refs seemed to be racing each other to saddle the stars of one national semifinal — Ohio State’s Greg Oden and Georgetown’s Roy Hibbert — with fouls, ruining one of the most-anticipated matchups in the past 25 years. It was almost as if they had made a bet: First guy to force the big men to the bench drinks free after the game. Result: Oden played 20 minutes and Hibbert 24. But at least we got to see a lot of very dramatic posturing by the guys who are supposed to blend into the hardwood.

So most of the time, they get my respect for doing a truly thankless job. But these recent examples of what I’d call control-freak officiating are troublesome for the sport.

Sometimes, you watch these guys — it’s not just Crawford or that diva of the college game, Ted Valentine — and wonder whether there is a persecution complex/power trip associated with putting that whistle in the mouth. Instead of serving as levelheaded stewards of the game vested with the authority to enforce fair play, they occasionally come across as bouncers in a bad mood while juicing on Dianabol.

Spoiling for a fight with the first guy who mouths off, that is.

The Final Four debacle was less egregious but indicative of the same problem: officials who seemed overly eager to show who’s boss, at the expense of the matchup every fan in America wanted to see.

If ever there were a game to let the big men play, this was it. It never happened, thanks to the hypervigilance of Dick Cartmell, Mike Kitts and (of course) Valentine.

Houston coach Tom Penders sagely said on ESPN Radio before the Georgetown-Ohio State game that he’d know how the game was going to play out when he saw which officials walked on the floor. I wonder whether Penders took one look at the crew and left the Georgia Dome before tip-off.

But this was only the culmination of a whistle-stop NCAA Tournament. As my friend Eric Crawford of the Louisville Courier-Journal reported last month, second-round NCAA Tournament games averaged nearly 38 personal fouls and fans were treated to 1,981 free throws in the first two rounds.

Nothing is quite as thrilling as watching almost 2,000 foul shots in four days.

That’s partly caused by poor play and poor coaching, which resulted in the abandonment of offensive flow late in the shot clock and the inevitable headfirst drive and ensuing block-charge call. (There are no jump-stop jump shots in college ball anymore.) But it’s also partly caused by compulsive whistle blowing, often in anticipation of a foul that never happens.

Mostly, the March Madness foulfest gave fans a chance to boo and coaches a chance to posture on national TV. (One of my favorite moments every March is when some outraged coach wheels around at the scorer’s table and shouts something at the attending member of the NCAA men’s basketball committee about the officiating. As if the committee member might stop the game right then and there to address the obvious wrong inflicted upon the persecuted coach’s team.) It also mucked up the games.

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

General NCS Basketball

41 Responses to Valentine: Diva of the College Game

  1. #44 17 24 04/19/2007 at 1:46 PM #

    Im sorry, but I was thrilled to see Duncan tossed out of that game. First of all, I realize that I do not watch a lot of the NBA, but whenever I do find myself watching a Spurs game, I notice that EVERY time a foul is called on Duncan, he complains. He makes the same stupid face we see over and over again. He scrunches up his face, raises his arms and gives a look to ref like hes crazy, and motions “wha? from his mouth. i can see this getting really annoying to a ref, to have every foul questioned. Then of course you see him mocking you on the bench like a 4 year old school girl, and clearly laughing at you, basically saying “Hey that guys so stupid its funny”. It was so unprofessional I was glad to see Crawford step up and say no more.

  2. redfred2 04/19/2007 at 3:23 PM #

    Todd, I had pretty much the same experiences with the hands STRAIGHT UP deal, only it was a kneecap, hitting me in the chest.

  3. CarnifeX 04/19/2007 at 3:26 PM #

    someone said ”seen but not heard” and I think someone should have told this guy the same thing…

  4. primacyone 04/19/2007 at 3:30 PM #

    Football Related – Quote from new Tight End Recruit Mario Carter. Maybe we can run the wishbone with two tight ends and no wide outs – Ha! If we run two tight end sets with our running backs; our play action should be pretty dang sweet if the TE’s can catch the ball.

    “I liked the organization of the practices by Coach O’Brien and what he was saying to me. I love that he puts education first, he throws first to the tight ends, and he loves the physical guys. That’s what we do here at Independence. They want everything done the right way instead of taking the shortcut.

    “The offenses are similar how they use the tight ends, the two tight sets. It is a great fit for me right htere. I didn’t want to go to the SEC because they don’t throw to the tight end that much.”

  5. redfred2 04/19/2007 at 4:01 PM #

    I just re-read my last post, and for safety sake, I think I’d probably better explain it, just so minds don’t wander all over the place. I was simply eluding to the fact that I’m a short, white guy.

  6. lush 04/19/2007 at 4:10 PM #

    yeah red, you lost me for a second, from that last post i was thinking you were a tall mongolian guy…. or a large brazilian…. or a lengthy frenchman…

  7. packpigskinfan23 04/19/2007 at 4:54 PM #

    CarnifeX- I havent laughed that hard in a LONG time!!!! I had “Jury Doodie” this week… and it has been hell. THANKS!

  8. redfred2 04/19/2007 at 5:08 PM #

    lush, funny stuff.

    But you understand, “HANDS STRAIGHT UP” and “knee in chest”, I didn’t want anyone to start visualizing without knowing exactly what I was saying.

    Maybe ^CarnifeX’s referee is to blame.

  9. highstick 04/19/2007 at 5:20 PM #

    Good posts on the state of current basketball. It is refreshing to see that I’m not the only one who would like to see the game played the way it was supposed to be and not turned into a “free for all”!.

    I talked with an assistant coach at another university about “palming” and he said that most of the coaches didn’t have a problem with calling it as long as it was called consistently. I can’t disagree with that at all.

  10. Primewolf 04/19/2007 at 5:52 PM #

    The calls that I think are ruining the game are:

    1. Offensive guy with the ball clearly initiates contact while shooting; the defensive player has done a great job staying in front of him and gets penalized by having a fould called on him.

    2. Walking, whether it is the extra hop or two that Hansbleed takes or the extra step by a guard as he penetrates.

    3. Defender has his hands straight up and is simply holding his position. Offensive guy leans into defenders arms.

    4.Backing down a defender who had established a strong position.

    I don’t like palming, but not sure how they could consistently call it since it is so pervasive these days.

    Good posts. I think the game should be called tighter in college and get away from NBA officiating.

  11. MrPlywood 04/19/2007 at 7:20 PM #

    I’m with ya GoldenChain… Witness Al Horford from Florida in one of the tourney games this year. The defender (don’t remember the team) had position, hands straight up, and Horford just bumped and banged him backwards right to the basket. The defender did everything right. No call. Whoever was calling the game marveled at Horford “using his body and strength” to “get position”.

    The other thing that bugs me are the end-of-game fouls committed by the trailing team. Everyone in the building knows the foul is coming, yet rarely are they called intentional, even when there is no attempt to get the ball, or they are exceedingly hard. I didn’t see the Marist game, but read the posts and it was evident that the refs let that get out of hand. Often the fouls are called with minimal contact, when much harder contact earlier in the game goes uncalled. If you’ve got TIVO you can sometimes see the ref anticipating and making the call before any contact.

    Consistency is key…

  12. redfred2 04/19/2007 at 8:13 PM #

    I agree with all of this stuff, but palming, and especially intentionally drawing the charge around the basket, and simply because you weren’t in position soon enough to make a legimate defensive play on a driving offensive player who’s already commited to his lane to the basket. I hate that, and there’s no way that stuff should be allowed.

    The way it once was, say their PG had it at top of the key and started down the right side. If the defensive player maintained his direction, say one foot outside, but directly parallel with the right side of the lane, and if the offensive couldn’t gain advantage with a fake, or blow by with sheer speed and get around the defender, then he wasn’t entitled and wasn’t going to get near the basket. That was when good foot work, and knowing how to stay in position, counted. Now it’s, lower the shoulder and simply push the defender out of the way, or muscle them all the way into the basket. NBA all the way. And people wonder why the finesse of the mid range jumper, and the touch it requires, has all but disappeared from the game.

  13. bTHEredterror 04/19/2007 at 8:59 PM #

    MrPlywood, it is hard as a State fan to decry one of the 1983 Pack’s most instrumental gameplans, but I tend to agree with you. Although the 2 shots at 10 fouls was intended to deal with the tactic somewhat, they should go further and call intentional if a clear attempt at the ball is not made. I can’t stand the shoulder grab! Make a damn play for the ball.

    My most heartfelt rant about recent changes in officiating I reserve for the dreaded and unecessarily dangerous, soulless, talentless tactic…..of the friggin legkick. I’m waiting for a leg to get broke on a play like the 3 consecutive fouls Singletary drew in the tournament against us. He was basically lying down in the air. It’s an extension of the defender not being allowed to his own space from the floor to the ceiling. The rule is if you jump straight up, no one can create contact with you in your space. Nowadays, the rule seems to be don’t get in the offensive players way.

  14. redfred2 04/20/2007 at 9:37 AM #

    So from taking all of this in, I think I see a slight pattern evolving. It seems that the perimeter needs to cleaned up, and that all of the hand checking and grabbing is limiting every skilled offensive player’s ability to create space and get off clean jumpshot without help, or the neccessity of a screen. A skilled player has to now ‘muscle’ a jumpshot if it’s not taken from well out on the perimeter. That is not right, and it’s hurting the game. Other the otherhand, the interior has become a mess all of the way around. Interior offensive players are allowed to bang and push opposing players out of their already established positions at will. BUT then, let a perimeter player who has gained advantage and established an open lane to the basket, is driving already and about to leave the floor, if that same previously beaten and banged interior defender can plant and ever so slightly create just a little contact, even if the shot is already taking place, FOUL. But on the offensive player.

    It makes no sense at all.

  15. CedarGloveWulf 04/20/2007 at 2:59 PM #

    “I had to LOL reading these comments. Most of you simply have NO CLUE what you’re talking about.”

    You tell em.

    No one here seems to understand the true complexities of basketball.
    They jus tlook at the ball go through the hoop and count two points when in reality it could be one, two or even three points. But the hard part is when some do not understand that three points are better than two and so complain about getting the three points when they could have gotten two even if they get the one afterwords.

    The great one understood these complexities and thus was not so harsh on the refs. He is a model for us all to follow

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. StateFans Nation » Blog Archive » Rejoice! Larry Rose Retiring! (& More Zebra Talk) - 04/27/2007

    […] Related * We have recently discussed the diva of the college basketball officiating fraternity, Ted Valentine. […]

Leave a Reply