Well, how many Final Four selections have you already lost out of your Bracket?
Which upsets did you guess correctly?
What did you expect from the ACC in this year’s NCAAT?
Here’s how I rated the ACC going into the NCAAT:
Overall: No one was playing consistently enough to go very far this year. As we discussed the NCAAT last week at work, I told several friends that I expected alot of quick exits for the ACC this year.
UMd was on fire until the ACCT. I didn’t know what to make of their loss to Miami. But they drew Florida in the round of 16, so it was an easy decision….but they didn’t even make it to UF.
I didn’t really have any kind of read on BC…but since they drew Georgetown in the second round it didn’t really matter. They had the good grace to exit just as I predicted.
UVa lost to the three bottom teams in the ACC over the last three weeks of the regular season. That led me to conclude that they would exit rather quickly. Luckily for Wahoo fans, they were grossly over-seeded and managed to get one win to break a long dry spell. As I expected, they bowed out to UT.
I had both Duke and GT losing in the second round….and they didn’t even make it that far.
As far as UNC, I always pick to them to lose to the first ranked team that they face….and Texas managed to lose today. Oh well, as soon as they run into a set of Big 10 officials their run will probably be over. I am hoping for some dumb stares like the Duke players gave last year as LSU bounced them out.
Now for some of our readers, the following table will summarize the largest surprise of this tournament:
2007 NCAAT First Round Results |
|||||
|
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Seed |
Team |
Conf |
Rank |
Point Diff |
|
13 |
Davidson |
Southern |
19 |
-12 |
|
13 |
|
Am. East |
20 |
-27 |
|
13 |
|
Western |
9 |
-12 |
|
13 |
Holy Cross |
Patriot |
17 |
-10 |
|
14 |
Oral |
Mid Cont |
22 |
-16 |
|
14 |
Penn |
Ivy |
18 |
-16 |
|
14 |
|
Horizon |
12 |
-19 |
|
14 |
|
MAC |
14 |
-2 |
|
15 |
|
Atl. Sun |
27 |
-25 |
|
15 |
|
Big Sky |
24 |
-28 |
|
15 |
|
Sun Belt |
21 |
-15 |
|
15 |
|
Southland |
26 |
-13 |
|
16 |
Cent |
NE |
28 |
-21 |
|
16 |
|
|
25 |
-21 |
|
16 |
Niagra |
MAAC |
23 |
-40 |
|
16 |
|
SWAC |
32 |
-43 |
|
|
|
Average |
-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 NIT First Round Results |
|||||
|
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Seed |
Team |
Conf |
Rank |
Point Diff |
|
7 |
|
MAC |
14 |
-16 |
|
7 |
Marist |
MAAC |
23 |
|
3 |
7 |
|
Am. East |
20 |
-2 |
|
7 |
|
Sun Belt |
21 |
-6 |
|
8 |
|
SWAC |
32 |
-19 |
|
8 |
|
MEAC |
30 |
-24 |
|
8 |
|
|
25 |
-24 |
|
8 |
|
Atl. Sun |
27 |
-7 |
|
|
|
Average: |
-12 |
|
The NCAA has managed to come up with a system that puts two teams from some of the weakest conferences into post-season tournaments. Brilliant…absolutely brilliant. Alot of people complain about cupcake games in Nov/Dec, but I hate the March cupcakes most of all.
For all you long-shot, dark-horse lovers out there…Have I told you about my plan for a I-AA division in basketball? They could use the NIT for their post-season tournament and let more real teams into the NCAAT. 😉