NCAA Revokes Moronic Clock Rules

It’s a rare and beautiful thing – a victory for common sense.

* Sunday Morning Quarterback: Rules committee comes running back fans, sanity

* The Wizard of Odds: Link

In place of the nonsense, drama-killing clock rules of 2006, we get a more tailored set of measures that seem eminently reasonable and don’t fundamentally alter the game for the worse:

Beyond killing the running clock after changes in possession, the rule changes include:

1) Kickoffs will be from the 30-yard line instead of the 35. The clock won’t start until the receiver touches the ball; last season it started as soon as the ball was kicked. Tuberville estimates 90 percent of kickoffs will now be returned.

“You’ll find that kicking it out of the end zone will be rare, and it will add excitement to the game,” Oregon coach Mike Bellotti said. “There will be more pressure on the kick-coverage team and more pressure on the defense because the offense is going to get better field position.”

2) Coming out of a television timeout, the play clock for the first play of a possession will be 15 seconds instead of the normal 25.

“The teams have been standing out there for almost three minutes during a TV timeout,” Tuberville said. “They don’t need 25 more seconds to get to the line and run a play.”

3) Charged team timeouts — not TV timeouts — will be cut by 30 seconds. This will be football’s version of basketball’s 30-second timeout. It will allow a coach to stop the clock but without a long delay. The timeout will last 30 seconds plus the 25 seconds on the play clock.

4) On kickoffs, the play clock will start once the kicker is handed the ball by the official. In the past, the kicker could take as much time as he wanted before kicking the ball. Now, he is on the clock and a violation will result in a 5-yard penalty.

“That idea actually came from the coaches,” said Rogers Redding, the SEC’s supervisor of officials. “They thought a lot of time was being wasted getting the guys in position to kick the ball. This will speed up that process.”

5) The time allowed for instant replay reviews will be capped at two minutes. This will save some time but not a lot. The average replay review last season was 1:49, according to the NCAA.

6) …tarting in 2008, college football will go to a 40-second play clock like that now used in the NFL. The 40-second clock will start at the end of every play. College football currently uses a 25-second clock that doesn’t start until the ball is put in position and declared ready for play.

I especially like using the NFL-style 40 second clock, which will ensure more predictability and consistency in end-game situations. There is so much common sense that I wonder if the NCAA outsourced this rules review…

About BJD95

1995 NC State graduate, sufferer of Les and MOC during my entire student tenure. An equal-opportunity objective critic and analyst of Wolfpack sports.

'06 Football '07 Football General NCS Football

46 Responses to NCAA Revokes Moronic Clock Rules

  1. tractor57 02/16/2007 at 10:12 AM #

    And I predict moving the kick offs to the 30 yard line will actually lengthen the game. How many kickoffs have you seen without a blocking in the back penality?

  2. gopack968 02/16/2007 at 10:56 AM #

    I am going to assume that coaches were OK with the 30 second cut to their timeouts. Does not seem long enough to make adjustments, get water, and get back on the field.

  3. gumbydammit 02/16/2007 at 11:10 AM #

    So I read the headline too quickly, thought it said “NCAA revokes moronic rulers”, and got all excited because I thought that Jethro was gonna get canned….

  4. MadWolf92 02/16/2007 at 11:13 AM #

    The point of a kickoff is to return the ball. I’d be happy if 100% of kickoffs were returned.

  5. RickJ 02/16/2007 at 11:28 AM #

    The dreaded “sky kick” may come back in vogue.

  6. RedTerror29 02/16/2007 at 11:29 AM #

    “I am going to assume that coaches were OK with the 30 second cut to their timeouts. Does not seem long enough to make adjustments, get water, and get back on the field.”

    I’m not sure of the percentages, but it is my understanding that most timeouts have a TV timeout tacked on anyway, so in effect the coach gets much more than 30 seconds.

    They did a good job with the changes. Even making time for plenty of commercials, football has WAY too much dead time that could be pruned.

  7. shellnc 02/16/2007 at 11:39 AM #

    >>>>The whole review process should go the way of the NFL. I’ve seen where the officials reviewed 3 or 4 plays in a quarter! You should only get 1 (or 2) per half, so (as a coach) you better make it count if you want to CHALLENGE.

  8. shellnc 02/16/2007 at 11:50 AM #

    I would like to see teams given a 2 strikes and you’re out challenge system.

    I have seen NFL games where there was a borderline call relatively early in a ballgame and the team got it wrong. They are then basically down to one challenge for the rest of the ballgame. The only saving grace is the final 2 minutes of the game.

    With the NFL rules. If they lose a challenge and then have to use one in say the 3rd quarter, then they are at the mercy of the refs. If you allow them to keep challenging until they get 2 wrong, then it will keep screwy refs in check.

    Under the cureent rules they can make 3 blatantly bad calls and you are then out of challenges, whether you are right or wrong.

    I think the college system of checking every play is stupid.

  9. tcthdi-tgsf-twhwtnc 02/16/2007 at 11:50 AM #

    I guess this means that kickoffs following a penalty will come from the 15. Where are ‘free kicks’ after a safety kicked from now? The 20?

  10. Dan 02/16/2007 at 2:34 PM #

    Its about time the 40 second rule comes in.

    The next NFL rule needed is the force out rule on pass completions.

  11. TNCSU 02/16/2007 at 2:55 PM #

    ^^^I would like to see teams given a 2 strikes and you’re out challenge system.

    I would agree with that.

    With the current system, if you challenge and win, you’re still screwed if they “miss” another call — because you’re “out” of challenges, although your challenge was overturned.

  12. 66pack 02/16/2007 at 3:08 PM #

    the rule change was to give tv more ad time and also time for video review of plays-mainly video review.

  13. MatSci94 02/16/2007 at 9:38 PM #

    Not related at all, but there is a nice bit on http://www.espn.com ‘s front page about Kay Yow, and the Wolfpack’s upset of #2 UNC.

  14. packpigskinfan23 02/17/2007 at 11:04 AM #

    ^what a great game that was last night. I was there… and although there was a LOT of blue in Renyolds the RED part of the crowd was making all the noise.

    This is also a bit unrelated, but I think it would be good to see what SFN bloggers have to say on Dana Bible a bit more in depth. We know his name is going to come up a lot next year. hopefully for the good. I got this quote of the GoPack interview.


    Q: What kind of offense is Dana Bible going to bring to NC State?

    Bible: First off, it’s not Dana Bible’s offense. It’s NC State’s offense. It’s a product of the head coach, the offensive coaches and the players. We put our players in position to do what they do well. We are going to work hard to work to the strength of our players. That is what we did at Boston College and that is what I have done at every place I have been. I learned along the way that what you might want to be and what you can be might be two different things. We are always going to play to what our players can do. We will play to our strengths.”

    I personally love to hear this, and I hope this is how it works out. It was obvious to me that under Tressman we were not playing to our strengths at all. we never seemed to have any kind of game plan that worked for Stone. Since the coaching staff was stubborn and stuck with him for so long, you would think they could come up with something!!! We also knew that Evans loved the “no huddle” and worked much better in it. But we refused to use it.

    I cant wait to see how things turn out next year. the QB/OL positions are the ones that are going to determine our number of W’s. that battle for the top spot at QB is going to be fun to watch!!

  15. vtpackfan 02/17/2007 at 12:10 PM #

    He’s right when he says they have played to their strengths (at BC), but he is under playing his value of a play caller and strategist IMO. At BC they had remarkable balance for an impressive output. If you just “play to your strengths” then you would expect an offense to do really well running (if you had an option QB) vs. passing (no huddle, shot gun type). It has been slightly different for TOB and Bible in that they play to their strengths against a given opponet, an important distinction of not.

    I watched two games from start to finish this year that involved the Eagles, against us and the Bowl game vs. Navy. In the latter it was obvious that Bible wanted to get to a point where he could expose the coverage of the midshipmen and beat them in the open field with deep slants by the WR’s and and long routes by the TE’s. What was necesarry was poise and accurate delivary by Ryan (QB)and above average pass blocking (* see rest of story). What made this interesting is that he used the run to soften up the defense at the beggining and they subsequently fell behind in the score because of trick passing paly of Paul Jonhson and some sloppy defense. They stuck with it and it culminated in an exciting win.

    The game vs. State was not their best performance. They tried to play to their strenghts against the given opponet. Bible saw a team with alot of team speed and tried to muscle us up the middle. Tank Tyler was just coming off the Southern Miss embarrasment and had the game of his life. He literally blew up BC’s middle line and disrupted them off on virtually every play he lined up on. When the switched to their timing passing plays our coverage was up to the task. It was our best defensive game of the year by far. If I remember right BC had some costly penalties at some crucial periods.

    Another interesting tendency of Bible’s offense is the “special” goal line players inserted to score TD’s. Often an athelitic pass rusher on defense comes in on certain goal line plays. I’m curious on seeing whether this was a by-product of how BC was restricted in recruiting and an effort to get more of of the talent they had, or something else. I like the idea of having a guy come in for a play or two in these situations because it signals to the rest of the guys that “we got to get this done, we’re not settling for a fg”. Alot of defenses play a “bend but don’t break” style and players can get complacent with how there being defended going down the field, only to be taken off guard when the defense stiffens up on a shortened field. Having “special teams” goal line players can give your offense the edge it needs to get the job done in these cases, IMO.

    *The rest of the story is how this playing to our strengths shapes up in the first year. From what I’ve seen this staff wants some flexabilty from game to game or half to half. If either Stone or Evans show great profiency in one area and not alot of improvement in another then I don’t see it helping their chances and may open the door for Beck or Burke to step in. Likewise, OL will need to show the abiltity to do both run and pass blocking atleast average. I don’t think that a monster run blocker who has crap technique in pass blocking will get an easy nod to start just because we can play to his strenght. The RB’s should be the most interesting of all. We have huge talent in that area but alot of question marks remain to be answered on which one or two of this group can play disciplined, team first football (i.e. blocking, hitting the right holes). Spring practices should be interesting.

  16. BorntoHowl 02/17/2007 at 3:04 PM #

    Toward the end of next season, we’re going to see how idiotic the start the clock when the ref hands the ball to the kicker really is. This should not be applied inside of 2 minutes of both halves. If you score with 24 seconds or less left, the game (or half) is over. Can you burn a timeout to keep that from happening? The end of game excitement where the score is less than a TD is being severely compromised.

    However, it’s a real change of pace with the NCAA for common sense to be able to be mentioned in anything they do. All the other rules reek of common sense!

  17. crackdog 02/17/2007 at 6:10 PM #

    BorntoHowl, I believe the play clock starts when the kicker gets the ball, not the game clock.

  18. the_phisherman 02/17/2007 at 6:29 PM #

    ^^After dominating FSU, I figured that James must have definitely gotten into Amato’s Doghouse, because he hardly played at all after that.

    I think James’s playing time took a big hit when Blackman was healthy enough to return to the starting line up. As for why he wants to leave, your guess is still much better than any of mine.

  19. RabidWolf 02/17/2007 at 7:49 PM #

    Ummm…No new posts? On Vacation? How about the Wolfpack women taking UNX to the wood shed? What a ball game! I know, it’s women’s bball, but that was one of the best games I have seen….period. Now all we need is for the men to win in Chapel Hell, a win in FB, and a season sweep in baseball, then we can all talk as much shit as we want to for as long as we want to, and the Holes can’t say anything about it.

  20. highstick 02/17/2007 at 10:21 PM #

    Good game for the women last night! I thoroughly enjoyed telling my Tarhole buds how “we own their basketball teams”! LOL! Wouldn’t another win against the men and referees be something else!

  21. StateFans 02/19/2007 at 11:15 PM #

Leave a Reply