ESPN.com Article On Coaches Getting Fired

Established college football coaches often don’t go gently into the good night of dismissal. Not only have the big boys crossed the $2 million-a-season salary threshold, but their attorneys have learned how to structure their contracts so the university must pay through the roof if fickle boosters try running them off campus.

If he’s fired, for example, Tommy Tuberville, who could lecture on the sins of booster involvement, would collect $7 million from Auburn.

Phillip Fulmer would get $4.325 million from Tennessee if the Vols send him packing.

Mack Brown would be due $3.5 million from Texas.

But the clear winner if the bottom falls out, according to ESPN.com’s review of the contracts of the head coaches at most of the top public football-playing schools in the Top 25 this year, is Frank Beamer; he would be owed $8.032 million if Virginia Tech no longer wants his services

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

General NCS Football

9 Responses to ESPN.com Article On Coaches Getting Fired

  1. old13 12/20/2006 at 10:37 AM #

    It’s things like this that turned me against pro sports in the 80’s. Guess next coaches will start holding out (i.e., striking) for more!

  2. class of 74 12/20/2006 at 10:46 AM #

    If we are dumb enough to offer it they surely will take it. And it seems plenty of us are making very dumb offers these days.

  3. VaWolf82 12/20/2006 at 11:16 AM #

    Like most things in life, salaries are a function of the revenue generated by a particular “industry”. One of the must know web-sites is the Equity in Athletics website where the Fed Govt displays information filed by universities.

    http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/search.asp

    Let’s use Alabama as an example. For the fiscal year ending 6/30/2006, Alabama football generated $44.4M versus FB expenses of $16.7M. Total athletic dept revenue was $68.6M versus total expese of $61.5M.

    DISCLAIMER: If you look at the numbers, its clear that every university doesn’t file the same numbers in the same way. For example, UMD always reports expenses perfectly matching revenue for the entire athletic department. This year, NC State did the same thing.

  4. GAWolf 12/20/2006 at 11:31 AM #

    Don’t you reckon that’s because the Wolfpack Club pays the difference? In other words, the school shows the athletics department’s income versus revenue to be a wash. I would guess… guess being key… that despite the revenue produced by basketball and football that our athletics department costs more to run per year than they make. We show it as a wash because the booster club covers the rest… which is the underlying purpose of booster clubs. What am I missing here?

  5. ldr of pk 75 12/20/2006 at 12:28 PM #

    Ah, ’tis the season of “better to give than receive”. We’ve all pretty much lost our minds when it comes to support of atheletics over, say, academics or business. Or that we raise hell about a CEO, CFO or any executives salary for that matter, but keep paying the piper without a whimper to support the A-Rods, Iversons, and TO’s of the world. I love atheletics, but can’t we look at the business model of sports to see that it is seriously broken? That’s just my opinion. Colleges at least pony up with their “own” money above and beyond base salaries, instead of like the Pro model of whine to the tax payer, the league, or anyone. Oh well, Happy Holidays.

  6. highstick 12/20/2006 at 1:24 PM #

    To some extent, I don’t have a problem with the “buy outs” and long as there are performance standards that the coach must meet. And the performance standards don’t encourage continuing mediocrity. Of course, if the institution’s goal is to settle for mediocrity, then that’s ok too. But the institution’s administration has to be responsive to those who pay the bills, i.e. the contributors and the ticket buyers.

    Does this sound like where we’ve been for quite a few years?

    THE PACK IS ON THE PROWL AND LOOKING FOR NUMBER 8 TONIGHT!!!!

  7. GAWolf 12/20/2006 at 2:23 PM #

    Didn’t know where else to post this, but these two quotes made me somewhat giddy for a moment: (From Coach O’Brien being asked about what he thought about NC State’s football program before coming here)

    A. I knew something about the school and program being [an assistant at Virginia] for 15 years. Getting off the bus [for the State-BC game] and looking at these facilities and thinking there’s been a major commitment here by the administration … to be a top-flight football team.

    “To put it in perspective, we’re at Florida State and my safety from San Diego is standing next to me and I said, ‘Are you scared?’ He said, ‘No, Coach, I played at N.C. State.’ So just the perception of that night, the way the crowd was, it wasn’t lost on our football team. All that with the ability to sell the state university, to be in the heart of ACC country.”

  8. packbackr04 12/20/2006 at 3:04 PM #

    nice ga wolf, good find, obrien is goona be a great fit. he wants a challenge and to get to the next level, we will help each other get there.

    also relating this thread to obie… isnt this why obies contract is so great. his guaranteed salary is low but his incentive package was great. meaning the guaranteed money he would be due in case of termination, was signifigantly lessened as his guaranteed salary is not huge (comparitively). the incintive money is large, but the university doesnt have to buy that part out in case of termination… is that right?

  9. Sam92 12/20/2006 at 4:18 PM #

    how much did Chuck get?

Leave a Reply