N&O Embarrasses TSN’s Mike Farrell

Score one for accuracy in reporting!!! We’re laughing all the way to the fact-checker on this one.

A few weeks ago, The Sporting News’ Mike Farrell penned a blog entry whose accuracy and analysis/conclusions we destroyed in this entry that is well worth the read.

Despite the fact that 100% of Chuck Amato’s seven verbal commitments (at the time) hailed from North Carolina High Schools, the crux of Farrell’s piece was that Chuck Amato doesn’t recruit from NC High Schools Makes sense on the front-end, eh (sarcasm)? (read our entry for the truth on Farrell’s dribble).

We’d like to thank the News & Observer for a little accuracy on the matter in their piece this morning, “Wolfpack Turns Focus to State”.

It’s a good, quick read that includes some great facts about past recruiting and some detail about recent developments on the topic of Chuck Amato’s in-state recruiting:

State coach Chuck Amato has worked to build bridges with in-state coaches this spring. He hosted a lengthy dinner meeting and frank discussion with several area high school coaches. The Wolfpack also has been the first school to offer scholarships to several prospects this spring.

Considering that this^ happened long before Farrell’s article on the topic, wouldn’t you think that he would have done at least an ounce of research on what CTC has been doing recently BEFORE writing his hit piece?

The following info is the biggest hit to Farrell, whose entry curiously crticized CTC’s inability to sign – not try to recruit, but to actually to sign – certain players from North Carolina High Schools in the past.

During the past five years, 22 of the 40 players in the state who were rated four or five stars by scout.com signed with out-of-state schools.

(During the past five years) there have been 10 five-star players since 2002 and only three — N.C. State recruits Toney Baker (2005), Demario Pressley (2004), and A.J. Davis (2002) — signed with in-state schools.

So…NC State has signed 30% of the 5-star players from North Carolina in the last five years, representing 100% of the signees by NC-based colleges. Yet, Mike Farrell chose to criticize Chuck Amato for not landing top high school players instead of the guy who coaches at the “flagship’ university that is the traditional preference for such talent?

About StateFans

'StateFansNation' is the shared profile used by any/all of the dozen or so authors that contribute to the blog. You may not always agree with us, but you will have little doubt about where we stand on most issues. Please follow us on Twitter and FaceBook

Football Recruiting General Media NCS Football

16 Responses to N&O Embarrasses TSN’s Mike Farrell

  1. RAWFS 07/23/2006 at 5:06 PM #

    Don’t expect any sort of retraction from Mike Farrell.

    It was a hit and run piece and was obviously poorly researched if it was researched at all. There certainly was no original reporting done by Farrell. He ended up with a hack-job of a column that was full of factual errors. As a national columnist, he’s at the pinnacle of his profession?

    If so, journalism is dead.

    Perhaps it is the nature of the interconnected world we now live in, but it seems like too many sports journalists simply leech their material off of one another. Used to be it would be rare to read the Wilmington, Raleigh, Fayetteville and Charlotte papers in one day — so it was safe for columnists to freely duplicate one another and to their respective audiences it would seem like a fresh perspective. Same for the national columnists, who with Nexis at their beck and call (not to mention Google, etc.) can read what the local guys are saying.

    Thing is, you get one of two guys with and axe to grind (think beady-eyed weasel who just got promoted at CBS Sportsline) who writes a deliberate piece of yellow journalism after which the mockingbirds all parrot his words — as if they were truth. At that point their own “truth” is created…and lies become fact.

    Fortunately, the blogosphere stands at the ready to hold MSM’s feet to the fire and point out when their self-annointed emporers have new clothes. Even though it was the N&O that put the truth out there (sounds strange to say, doesn’t it?) — I would not be the least bit surprised if they detected the truth from here or nearby.

  2. beowolf 07/23/2006 at 9:42 PM #

    Journalism isn’t dead, but as RAWFS alludes to, the blogosphere has made is so that the idea that Journalism is something that can only be done by Dweebs with Four-Year Degrees in Journalism sure is. It’s simple economics. Prior to the Internet, it was just too costly in terms of time and resources for very smart people in other fields than journalism to pursue a question of interest to them, even if they have particular knowledge concerning it. The Internet and sites like StateFansNation.com have reduced transactions costs to virtually nil, so that, for example, someone who has particular knowledge of how to track a certain airplane could find out about a meeting with a certain coach that the media had NO CLUE about. It also has made it much easier and far less costly for smart people in other fields to ANALYZE and comment on sports trends — and more often than not, their analytical skills honed in serious fields bring about more cogent analyses than those employed by someone whose chosen field is sports journalist.

    Prior to the Internet, some dork could put out a slap-dash, ill-researched, error-ridden and factually inaccurate hatchet job of a book against a coach and watch it be lapped up by the locals news hounds who (a) don’t like that coach and (b) think they’ve got Pulitzer material. Let Peter Golenbock try that crap today and within 24 hours this site and several others will have raised ten dozen SIGNIFICANT questions of the book that the J-school pencil-pushers would never have thought to ask — and that WEREN’T asked at the time, until well after all the PR damage was done.

  3. Jeff 07/23/2006 at 10:33 PM #

    Wow. ^Both of these comments are awesome.

  4. Cardiff Giant 07/24/2006 at 8:59 AM #

    Beowolf alludes to a critical function of the internet – truthseeker, in both the athletic department and media contexts.

    Consider a national and local story we all know – the Bush guard matter and the Barry Saunders “chant” column. In both cases, the entities supposedly charged with acting to defend the specious charges – the Bush White House on the one hand and NC State Media Relations on the other – were effectively useless. It was up to the internet sites to speak the truth and get the real story out.

    Most of all, consider the Sendek issue. But for the internet, Fowler and Murphy could have continued, unimpeded, to spread the fiction that the entire State community absolutely loved Herb Sendek. And Fowler himself helped dig his favorite coach’s grave by not only ignoring fan concerns expressed on the internet, but in dismissing such fans as the famous “lunatic fringe.” Crazy.

  5. Cardiff Giant 07/24/2006 at 9:01 AM #

    Also, it would indeed be interesting to see the firestorm that would erupt over a sloppy hack job like the Golenbock book today, as Beo suggests. There would be accurate, point by point refutations and lists of factual errors in circulation within 24-48 hours.

  6. Cardiff Giant 07/24/2006 at 9:06 AM #

    Finally, it is only VERY rarely that the traditional media serves as a corrective force for other portions of the traditional media, as here. It’s a blue moon sort of event, and usually prompted by local/national rivalries in the sports context (there’s no question the national sports media openly disdain the locals as ignorant hicks, when the reverse is actually true in terms of ACC sports). Nice job by the N&O, which continues to take baby steps toward atoning for decades of sin regarding NC State issues.

  7. GoldenChain 07/24/2006 at 9:31 AM #

    Drive by media, hit and run pieces, they’re the standard of the day.
    Like I’ve said before, the solution is to win. Then these pieces will stop.

  8. vtpackfan 07/24/2006 at 9:44 AM #

    I can’t follow these acts, I’m just an opening act with a frontman who has stage fright. This thread is more accesible with the N&O link and the strong comment above, I had a hard time warming up to it yesterday. I like what was said above commenting on drive by reporting. Its a welcome reminder that we have sites like this one where one can depend on counter arguments and critical thinking (most of the time).

    I regards to in state football recruiting, I still think we have a ways to go to catch up to UNX. The wholesale approach that Bunting uses limits our chances in building a strong base to build a consistent winner. I love that we got A.J. Davis since he was supposed to run track for them, but we have a serious need for depth at the OL position that is disrupted by the “grey shirting” of so many NC preps. Now Duke is coming on strong, and we always have to fend off WF, Clemson and others. This is a huge step forward and I hope it brings about some positive results for “The North Carolina STATE’ University.

  9. vtpackfan 07/24/2006 at 9:54 AM #

    TSN really does not have a clue on how rich the climate of NC high school football has become, or how deep the pool runs. Have them come down to the Carter-Finley preseason jamboree to get caught up

  10. tmb81 07/24/2006 at 10:14 AM #

    There were point by point refutations of Peter Golenback. But this was 1989. Today Golenback may sit easily accessable on library shelves…but the refutations are on not so easily accessable microfiches.

    When “hit and run” journalists write poorly researched articles, they spread and get picked up by TV announcers. Then some color analyst doing our game, parrots the article because it was “googled” during his research.

    So the mission is clear… get the truth out and to the right people ASAP.

  11. redfred2 07/24/2006 at 11:15 AM #

    This is why people shouldn’t believe a single source of press about other coaches, players, or universities and then run around spouting off about it.

    It is very naive to complain about our own negative media coverage, then hang on every word with utter delight, when the same happens to others.

  12. joe 07/24/2006 at 12:11 PM #

    Am I the only one who thinks it’s pretty funny that all this talk about how great blogs are compared to regular media was prompted by a blog article that praises regular media? 🙂

    SFN: That is ironic/unique. Also think that it evidences that we’ve got no problem giving proper credit where credit is deserved.

  13. BladenWolf 07/24/2006 at 12:12 PM #

    Outstanding post SFN.

    I think it’s a tribute to this site, and to the regular contributors as well (thanks RAWFS and Beowolf), to have such thoughtful analysis and insights about the FACTS regarding our recruiting efforts and exposing the tenuous grasp the national/local media outlets have on reality.

    If Mr. Farrell doesn’t know it yet, the talent that lies just in the HS conference in my area (Mid-Southeastern 4A) are outstanding and provide 4 star athletes on a regular basis.

  14. WolfpackSteelerfan 07/24/2006 at 12:45 PM #

    joe,

    That’s a good point. However, I think that the reason the conversation began (comparing blogs with the regular media), is that it is actually surprising to see a fair story in the regular media. In this case the N&O. If it were very common, the initial post probably wouldn’t have had many responses. Or, they would have all focused on the recruiting story itself.

  15. Mr O 07/24/2006 at 1:17 PM #

    My guess is that you could find plenty of blogs that are just as bad as guys like Farrell and the idiot who writes about college basketball that recently got promoted by somebody. I stopped paying attention to him so long ago that I don’t even remember his name.

  16. RAWFS 07/25/2006 at 8:53 AM #

    There are indeed plenty of blogs as bad as any writer out there.

    They do not, however, command the same audience or attention except in very rare cases.

    That and the blogosphere is a bit of a meritocracy: good blogs with salient and fact-based writing tend to garner more readers and keep them, while poorly researched and written blogs tend to end up in the unvisited back alleys of the internet.

    Witness this blog as a for example. It blossomed during the coaching search as it unearthed tidbits of news for a public starving for info in the vacuum that Lee Fowler had created. Now it is clearly the leading blog related to NCSU and it is because of the interesting and ongoing quality of the writers here.

    Were SFN to have the budget and time that a Charlotte Observer has for covering NCSU, I would put money on Statefans Nation as doing the better job.

Leave a Reply